You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Joe Biden: 'No Amendment to the Constitution Is Absolute'
2021-04-10
[PJMEDIA] On Thursday, President Joe The Big Guy Biden
...46th president of the U.S. We get to suffer the consequences...
announced new executive actions on gun control, trying to limit "ghost guns" and to make it easier for people to flag their own family members who shouldn’t be allowed to purchase firearms. In announcing his gun restrictions, Biden specifically addressed the Second Amendment.

While Biden insisted that none of his gun control measures impinged on the Second Amendment, he also insisted that "no amendment to the Constitution is absolute."

"Nothing, nothing I’m about to recommend in any way impinges on the Second Amendment. They’re phony arguments suggesting that these are Second Amendment rights at stake for what we’re talking about," he argued.

Then came the key statement: "But no amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute."

"You can’t yell ’fire’ in a crowded movie theater. Recall the freedom of speech. From the very beginning, you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own. From the very beginning the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons," Biden argued. "So the idea is just bizarre to suggest that some of the things we’re recommending are contrary to the Constitution. Gun violence in this country is an epidemic."

Biden did not cite any of the Founders to support his idea that gun rights had limits from the very beginning. As Justin Haskins wrote in The Hill, the father of the Constitution, James Madison, assured Americans that the creation of a federal government would not involve the loss of this liberty.

"Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe," Madison wrote in Federalist 46, "which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europa
...the land mass occupying the space between the English Channel and the Urals, also known as Moslem Lebensraum...
would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it."

"The whole point Madison was making is that armed militias and local governments are a deterrent against an authoritarian national force," Haskins explained.

Samuel Adams said a Bill of Rights should include a guarantee that the "Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress ... to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms."

While Americans generally agree that only "peaceable citizens" should bear arms, gun control measures often go further.

The key aspect of Biden’s statement has to deal with constitutional amendments overall.
Posted by:Fred

#14  #2 ... but he introduced us to Anita Hill !!!
Posted by: irish rage boy   2021-04-10 16:25  

#13  Mind the opening warning. It is very true.

Posted by: swksvolFF   2021-04-10 14:57  

#12  Joe is a liar. Always has been.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2021-04-10 13:43  

#11  The Bidens are gun owners and place a lot of value on them for personal protection so their anti-Second Amendment is about control.
Posted by: Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589   2021-04-10 11:39  

#10  In order to properly hear Biden's voice when reading, one must cross their eyes and khat their teeth.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2021-04-10 10:53  

#9  I fully believe the 16th amendment is never absolute and needs to be revoked.
Posted by: DarthVader   2021-04-10 10:06  

#8  Right you are P2K. Nullification is a thing. Coming to a statehouse near you....
Posted by: Warthog   2021-04-10 08:30  

#7  The Constitution without amendments was a contract between the states and national government. It was ratified by the states, not the people. As with any contract, if one party breaches the agreement, the other parties are open to dissolving it. Just make sure you're the winner.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-04-10 07:40  

#6  

The Bill of Rights BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE, not the Government.

An like others above my comment have said.
Didn't he in as much imply inadvertently also the 14th could be revoked also?

So is the Biden Admin/ socialist-democrat party looking to return slavery and Jim Crow to the USA? or maybe revoke our rights to better control suppress the population.
Posted by: NN2N1   2021-04-10 06:43  

#5  In DC I was told no law is permanent. Congress can make the laws and change the laws. 200 year old law no matter what law it is.
Posted by: Dale   2021-04-10 04:19  

#4  Especially the 15th?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2021-04-10 02:56  

#3  So the 13th, 14th and 19th Amendments are not "Absolute"? Idjit.
Posted by: magpie   2021-04-10 01:33  

#2  do you really think that incoherent idiot remembers or gives shit about that?
Posted by: Chris   2021-04-10 00:46  

#1  Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Posted by: Blackbeard Barnsmell6454   2021-04-10 00:13  

00:00