| See also this. |
The paper just had to run a correction that amounts to a huge retraction of its "scoop" last year about then-President Donald Trump
...His ancestors didn't own any slaves...supposedly telling a Georgia election official "find the fraud" in the state’s presidential voting so she could be "a national hero." The actual audio file of that conversation has turned up, and it turns out he used no such words.
Trump instead urged the official, who The Wall Street Journal identifies as La Belle Frances Watson, to conduct a thorough investigation of Fulton County votes out of concern that "something bad happened" to ballots from the area. He also said she was doing the "most important job in the country right now." No threats, no assertion of certain fraud, no suggestion that she rig a recount or anything else nefarious.
Oddly, the correction appears online as a preface to the original story, yet the headline still accuses Trump of possible obstruction.
The paper originally relied on a single anonymous source for the tale, without letting readers know what (if anything) made that source credible. But the "news" so fit the anti-Trump biases of so many that it still spread everywhere, even becoming part of the "evidence" at Trump’s second impeachment.
Then again, Trump’s first two years in office were plagued by an investigation over supposed collusion with Russia in the 2016 election — a scandal created almost entirely by Washington Post and New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
stories similarly based on anonymous sources, sources whose damning claims were utterly debunked by the Mueller investigation.
Prestige papers are supposed to be better than this, but now their standards go out the window if it serves their partisan agendas.