| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| 'Inexplicable': Alito and Thomas Dissent as Supreme Court Strikes Down Pennsylvania Election Lawsuit |
| 2021-02-22 |
| [PJMedia] On Monday, the Supreme Court threw out several of the remaining challenges to the 2020 presidential election as moot, considering that former President Donald Trump ...the Nailer of NAFTA... conceded to Joe Foreign Policy Whiz KidBiden ...Candidate for president in 2020. We hold these truths to be self-evident. All men and women created ... by the — you know — you know, the thing... , who has now become president. Yet Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, arguing that the Supreme Court should have taken the opportunity to clarify election law, especially in the case of Pennsylvania. |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #20 Justice Roger Taney smiles in his grave: Finally, a Court that outdoes mine for shame and cowardice! |
| Posted by: Chuckles Wittlesbach1280 2021-02-22 22:09 |
| #19 Another step closer to the last resort to tyranny.... |
| Posted by: Vernal Pholutle8278 2021-02-22 20:54 |
| #18 Now worries we will get them at the ballot box..... oh wait. Can’t wait to see all the new rules on leftist run states: mail in ballots without validation and 10 days late, non citizen votes count,,,,, and remember that the Supreme Court said thumbs up! Michael Moore himself said in 2016 before November election that Trump would win because the only relief citizens have against Washington is voting. And America was sending the biggest FU message to Washington DC elitists. Well the elites have spoken in 2020/2021: voting does not matter”. |
| Posted by: Airandee 2021-02-22 20:33 |
| #17 Justice Thomas in his own words - very powerful! One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.” By the way, CUck Roberts of course went along with the dismissal without writing a thing. |
| Posted by: Deadeye Jaiting7534 2021-02-22 20:09 |
| #16 Fuck everyone in washington dc, including the crackheads , well the ones besides the politicians. |
| Posted by: Chris 2021-02-22 19:44 |
| #15 Tyler O'Neill said he conceded, so he must have. |
| Posted by: KBK 2021-02-22 19:19 |
| #14 #4 Can I add "weasels" to the description for SCOTUS? SWOTUS works. Supreme Weasel(s) sounds like a KKK designation. |
| Posted by: JHH 2021-02-22 19:10 |
| #13 #7 Scotus wanted to get rid of this 2020 hot potato--they did not want to touch this. To my ignorant view, this is grounds for impeachment of several SC justices. Posted by Knuckles Fluper5134 Unfortunately such action would be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. |
| Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839 2021-02-22 17:39 |
| #12 Trump never conceded. Show me where this happened. |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2021-02-22 17:22 |
| #11 SCOTUS has determined, correctly, that The Republic is dead. So, in their minds - what's the point? |
| Posted by: Rex Mundi 2021-02-22 16:35 |
| #10 Greatest legal philosophers of our time: "What difference, at this point, does it make?" |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2021-02-22 15:43 |
| #9 "Don't count on the supreme court to save America from tyranny" No Sh_t! there's only one US Government institution that can intercede in that, the first one created |
| Posted by: 746 2021-02-22 15:35 |
| #8 Seems like the next GOP candidate will have so surround themselves with hardcore zealot Libertarians so that we know they'll defend individual liberties and sane spending over other pet issues and pressures. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2021-02-22 15:28 |
| #7 well sheeet, so much for the 'high' court. |
| Posted by: irish rage boy 2021-02-22 15:18 |
| #6 Scotus wanted to get rid of this 2020 hot potato--they did not want to touch this. To my ignorant view, this is grounds for impeachment of several SC justices. |
| Posted by: Knuckles Fluper5134 2021-02-22 14:31 |
| #5 There’s a desperate need to impose consequences for the failure of authority in this land. - James Kunstler |
| Posted by: Knuckles Fluper5134 2021-02-22 14:30 |
| #4 Can I add "weasels" to the description for SCOTUS? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2021-02-22 13:44 |
| #3 “would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election,” it would “provide invaluable guidance for future elections.” The issues were sufficient to give guidance for future elections but there were no implications for the 2020 election? That doesn't make sense. Scotus wanted to get rid of this 2020 hot potato--they did not want to touch this. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2021-02-22 13:42 |
| #2 Don't count on the supreme court to save America from tyranny. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2021-02-22 12:53 |
| #1 This was a problem throughout Trump's presidency. He could not find good, conservative people to appoint. People like, Barr, Bolton, Haley, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett took the jobs and then stabbed him in the back. |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2021-02-22 12:44 |