You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Seattle May Pass 'Duress Legislation' to Give Criminals 'Poverty Defense'
2020-12-20
[JUDICIALWATCH.ORG] Elected officials in a major U.S. city plan to pass a law that will allow thieves to sell items they steal if they do it to earn money for basic needs and trespassers to set up camp on private property when it is to obtain adequate shelter. Dozens of other crimes—including assault and harassment—will be excused under the preposterous measure if suspects are poor, mentally ill or addicted to drugs. It is being crafted as a poverty defense and will allow municipal court judges to dismiss a multitude of crimes if poverty, mental illness or a substance-abuse disorder drove the perpetrator to commit them.Even for a famously liberal left coast city like Seattle it seems like a bit much. The proposal was first introduced during the Seattle City Council’s budget deliberations weeks ago, according to a local news report. It was put on hold over a budget process bureaucracy but has gained incredible steam and appears to have enough support to alter the city code early next year. "The idea could enormously impact the city — and set Seattle apart from the rest of the country in its approach to misdemeanor crimes," according to the news story, which includes the concerns of frustrated public safety advocates who say the law will essentially legalize most crimes in Seattle. Not surprisingly, the idea came from a "wave of activism and historic protests after the police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota," the Seattle newspaper story says. That motivated public defenders and community organizers to take advantage of the attention to police and court reforms to fix a "long-held frustration."

The force behind the push for the new law is a leftist organization called Decriminalize Seattle that opposes policing and the criminal legal system. The group has called for defunding the Seattle Police Department by at least 50% and reallocating the funds to "community led health and safety systems." It also demands the release of protestors arrested during recent violent mostly peaceful uprising without charges. An organizer with Decriminalize Seattle, identified as one of the law’s catalysts in the media, says "what we’ve already known is that the misdemeanor system is basically a system of cycling people in poverty through municipal court over and over again without meeting their basic needs." In late October Seattle City Councilwoman Lisa Herbold, who ironically chairs the public safety committee, introduced the measure to exempt low-level criminals. The politician, who represents West Seattle and South Park, writes in her official city blog that it is important to make meeting an individual’s immediate basic need an affirmative defense to a crime.



Posted by:Fred

#13  In that case I'd expect a lot of seth rich style robberies of prominent lefties, congress critters, media, celebrities, and Humanities professors.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2020-12-20 18:42  

#12  After a few months of a Biden-Harris administration, most of us will be able to claim this defense.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-12-20 17:33  

#11  I'm not sure but does "poverty defense" stop bullets?
Posted by: Silentbrick    2020-12-20 15:28  

#10  Was there a chainsaw bayonet on the .38?
Posted by: Matt   2020-12-20 13:02  

#9  Well lets see. Guy is a drug addict going to see his meth dealer (shows progressive traits, selfishness, and disregard for the feeling of others - both very 'positive' progressive traits) verses a woman taking her kids to school (shows responsibility and caring for her children - very nasty 'conservative' traits - likely a white 'breeder' out to exploit someone). Not to mention the use of a military-style assault .38 cal gun used to defend herself and her evil spawn (Alert! Alert! Alert!). She was probably on her way to shoot up her kids school with that Arsenal of Massive Death Dealing.
What do you think?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-12-20 12:52  

#8  #7 What are the races - that's the only factor that counts?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-12-20 12:35  

#7  Not only righteous, but good shooting.
Posted by: Clem   2020-12-20 12:33  

#6  Just out of curiosity, does the "immediate basic need" of the victim get taken into account? E.g.: Guy urgently needs a car to get to his meth dealer. He carjacks a woman trying to get her kids to school so they can learn critical race theory. Woman pulls out a dainty, ladylike .38 cal and aerates the guy's heart and lung systems. Righteous shooting?
Posted by: Matt   2020-12-20 12:30  

#5  You just can't make this shit up. I mean, you really can't.
Posted by: Clem   2020-12-20 12:24  

#4  To be known as "The Get Out of Jail Free Card"
(Race Card for short).
Posted by: Mercutio   2020-12-20 11:28  

#3  Why stop there? Why not decriminalize arson? That's also a sopposedly non-existent property related offense. Come to think of it, rape and murder should be decriminalized too. Disparate impact = racism
Posted by: Dino Bourbon8063   2020-12-20 06:01  

#2  Did the voters of Seattle really vote these dangerous clowns into office or was it Dominion?
Posted by: Ulavirong Omeager2818   2020-12-20 04:28  

#1  It is not the government's responsibility to meet the criminal's 'immediate basic need'.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-12-20 01:20  

00:00