You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Why Industrial Scale Fraud Is Just So Hard To Hide
2020-11-24
[American Thinker] People, we need to talk.

Way too many are caught in a media-induced despondency, knowing the presidential election was stolen, in the dark of night, vote counting suddenly stopped, vote counts on the television switched from Trump to Biden — yet each thinks he or she is the only one who saw it.

Why do I feel so alone?

Nobody can hide industrial scale fraud, of any sort, for long: Medicaid fraud, stock manipulation, fake invoices. The bigger the fraud, the harder it is to hide and thus the greater probability it is all going to come out. The words "...this would be the crime of the century" will likely be Tucker Carlson's "read my lips, no new taxes...." a year from now.

Let's talk about industrial level fraud.

It's all over the place.

Our teams uncovered some of the largest Medicaid fraud rings in the country. Doctors, attorneys, chiropractors, groups of recent immigrants all living in the same apartment building in Patterson, NJ. These connections were one of the largest "swoop and squat" insurance frauds ever discovered.

We broke the largest internet auction fraud in history and built the technology that enabled a major tech company to determine that Mary Jones was actually Sam McCarthy and Steven Simms, even though they had not a single field in common.

We know a bit about industrial scale fraud. So do a lot of people.

Remember Bernie Madoff?
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  Whenever Dem voters show an interest in electrical fraud (after they've lost) the GOP should ride the wave with policies/laws to fix election problems. Do it before the corrupt Dem machines can stop the very wave they created.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2020-11-24 16:30  

#7  The Dems don't seem to be very interested in the accusation of systemic election fraud. Yet, a couple of years ago, they seemed to be interested in the fact that voting machines were susceptible to fraud.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-11-24 16:17  

#6  I believe they did massive scale fraud and would have gone unnoticed except it still wasn't enough because of the red wave. That forced emergency extra fraud that was somewhat obvious (although may still be difficult to prove).
Posted by: rjschwarz   2020-11-24 11:11  

#5  I am discouraged that no perpetrators of fraud have yet confessed (at least none I know of).

There are claims of affidavits from people who were involved in the fraud.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2020-11-24 10:16  

#4  /\ ....one big difference is the data - after the security envelops are discarded it is impossible to show a vote was cast by an ineligible voter

And it is very likely NONE of the security envelopes will ever be found.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-11-24 08:20  

#3  election fraud is a different issue than medicare or securities

one big difference is the data - after the security envelops are discarded it is impossible to show a vote was cast by an ineligible voter

some fraud, e.g., more eligible voters, will remain discoverable but it may not be possible to find the source of the problem

I am discouraged that no perpetrators of fraud have yet confessed (at least none I know of).
Posted by: Lord Garth   2020-11-24 08:19  

#2  Madoff's Ponzi/pyramid scheme was no different than the one called Social Security but with one difference: one could voluntarily enter & exit Madoff's spiel.
Posted by: Clem   2020-11-24 07:01  

#1  Different time constraints.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-11-24 06:22  

00:00