You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Pentagon Draw-Down at U.S. Embassies Prompts Concern About Ceding Field to Global Rivals
2020-11-02
[WSJ (subscription req'd) via ZH] The Pentagon is said to have "quietly begun withdrawing" high ranking military officers from posts in Africa and the Middle East as part of a broader strategy of shifting resources to prioritize countering China and Russia, also as congressional caps which designate max numbers of generals and admirals in any given year must be met. However some say it will do the opposite - that is, the move will actually embolden US rivals in developing and politically restive parts of the globe.

This includes military attachés being withdrawn from multiple countries in West Africa, according to a new report in The Wall Street Journal. The role of a military attaché connected to the embassy's mission is crucial where the US works closely with a host country's military in fighting terrorism and maintaining political stability.

According to the WSJ report, "The position of defense attaché, the senior U.S. military representative in American diplomatic posts, is being downgraded in rank in eight key allied countries‐including the U.K. and Saudi Arabia‐according to an Aug. 24 order signed by Defense Secretary Mark Esper."

In many cases this will see generals or admirals replaced with colonels or Navy captains, which Congressional and defense critics of the move have said will harm US relationships and clout with the host countries, who will be less willing to coordinate key operations and intelligence sharing with lower ranking American officers.
Meh. Coordination happens with the designated decision maker, no matter what rank. Mr. Wife as a department head was making deals as representative of his company with counterpart senior VPs and company presidents, because his company pushed deal-making responsibility down to his level.
Esper's order means that by December 2022 110 general or admiral positions must be cut,
...and thereafter 110 generals and admirals retired...
but without specifying the particular countries where that will take place. The African continent (where AFRICOM has had a growing post-9/11 presence) will reportedly see a large reduction of top commanders.

Congressional and defense Russia and China hawks fear that when it comes to the Mideast-Africa regions especially, this will mean "ceding ground" and influence to Washington rivals.

Related: WSJ article
Posted by:Clem

#5  If keeping an eye on things is the job, I'da thought a low key SF captain and team would do a better job than a guy in an office at the embassy.
Apparantly a swivel chair is very important in this line of wourk.
Posted by: ed in texas   2020-11-02 22:09  

#4  Thank goodness we avoided this in Iraq and Afghanistan!
Posted by: Iblis   2020-11-02 09:28  

#3  #1 that's a point that 'experts' never want to contemplate. If you only have a small number of generals, then being a colonel becomes even more important to cover the field. Look up the ratio of general officers to overall service numbers in WW2 and today. That wasn't any grade 'creep' that was a quick march.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-11-02 05:30  

#2  Bad news for the MIC and 'Job After' military crowd. Intelligence community to lose embassy cover, forced to resume traditional clandestine collection? Working from home is catching on. Zoom in !
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-11-02 03:12  

#1  What if the colonels were given a set of shiny sprockets to wear?
Posted by: Thrairong Ebbusomp4597   2020-11-02 01:32  

00:00