You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Amy Coney Barrett: Judges Can't 'Walk in Like a Royal Queen' and Impose Their Will on the World
2020-10-14
[BREITBART] Judge Amy Coney Barrett addressed the widespread misinformation that judges can brazenly make rulings based on the whims of the day, explaining the process and stressing judges cannot just "walk in like a royal queen" and "impose" their will on the world.Chairman Lindsey Graham
...soft-spoken senator from South Carolina, former best buddy of John Maverick McCain. Since McCain's demise, Graham has become more outspoken, more Republican and more of a supporter of President Trump. The speech he gave in support of Brett Kavanaugh was downright manly and really cheesed off the Dems...
(R-SC) prompted Barrett to explain how the process works, using the District of Columbia v. Heller as an example. Barrett briefly explained there has to be a law, lawsuit, appeal, and the court granting cert before it makes a ruling.

When asked if the process remains the same no matter the issue — including guns, health care, child sacrifice abortion, campaign finance — Barrett emphasized judges cannot just impose an agenda at random.

"Judges can’t just wake up one day and say, ’I have an agenda. I like guns. I hate guns. I like child sacrifice abortion. I hate child sacrifice abortion’ and walk in like a royal queen and impose, you know, their will on the world," she said.

"You have to wait for cases and controversies, which is the language of the Constitution, to wind their way through the process," she continued.

Graham then asked Barrett another hypothetical. What if, he said, a state made a law only allowing individuals to own no more than six bullets.

In that case, Barrett said, parties would have to sue the state arguing that the law is unconstitutional. If it made its way to the Supreme Court and it decided to hear the case, "you hear arguments from litigants on both sides."

"They write briefs. You talk to clerks as a judge. You talk to your colleagues, and you write an opinion. Opinions circulate and you get feedback from your colleagues so it’s an entire process," she explained.

"It’s not something that a judge or justice would wake up and say, ’Oh we’re hearing this case. I know what my vote’s going to be,'" she added.

Senator Asks ACB Which 'Notes' She's Been Referring To; She Holds Up BLANK Piece Of Paper

[TRENDINGPOLITICS] Amy Coney Barrett has displayed an immense scope of knowledge during the first two days of her confirmation hearings, and apparently she hasn't needed notes to recall any of it.

Senator Cornyn asked her which set of notes she's been referring to in order to answer these questions, her response was priceless.

"Most of us have multiple note books, notes and books and things like that in front of us. Can you hold up what you've been referring to when answering our questions?" Cornyn asked.

Barrett responded bey holding up a blank notepad, drawing laughs from the crowd.

"Is there anything on it?" Cornyn responded.

"Um...the letterhead that says United States Senate," Barrett responded with a smile.

"That's impressive", Cornyn said.
Related:
Amy Coney Barrett: 2020-10-13 ACB confirmation video FYI and sharing (bonus vids as well)
Amy Coney Barrett: 2020-10-12 'Republicans Pounce' On Democrats' 'Hypothetical' Plan To Destroy Judicial Branch
Amy Coney Barrett: 2020-10-12 Jake Tapper pulverizes Biden spox, repeatedly!
Posted by:Fred

#6  She is an extraordinary individual. (Almost) restores faith in this country that we can still produce such people.
Posted by: Oscar Trotsky3356   2020-10-14 11:19  

#5  /\ Yes, very smart. Not often you see an intellect as profound and dignified as hers on the teevee. I certainly hope she is confirmed.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-10-14 09:17  

#4  The Dems are trying to get Barrett to recuse herself in any case that involves voting. The ACA was a big issue. Abortion was a big issue also with the Dems. And of course, how wronged the Dems were with pushing Barrett through so quickly. They would do the same in a NY minute.

Barrett did a great job of not getting boxed in. She is smart. She should make a great new member of SCOTUS; a Constitutionalist who doesn't make law from the bench.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-10-14 09:15  

#3  Amy Coney Barrett: Judges Can't 'Walk in Like a Royal Queen' and Impose Their Will on the World

AH, but to be the governor of Michigan!
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-10-14 08:01  

#2  RBG used to though
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2020-10-14 02:15  

#1  maybe not on the world but on a district or a circuit

at least for a while

take Judge Sullivan for example = please
Posted by: Lord Garth   2020-10-14 00:34  

00:00