| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| BREAKING: Supreme Court Strikes Down Rewrite of State Election Law by District Court Judge ‐ The Battle Is Joined |
| 2020-10-06 |
| [RedState] Late Monday afternoon, the Supreme Court issued a “Stay” with regard to an order from a South Carolina federal district court judge who rewrote a provision of South Carolina election law due to the impact of COVID 19. Judge Julianna Michelle Childs, an appointee of President Obama, granted an injunction for Plaintiffs preventing the South Carolina election officials from enforcing a provision of South Carolina election law requiring a witness signature on an absentee ballot envelope. After about 60 pages of legal sophistry, Judge Childs finally gets around to holding the same way every other Obama-appointed Judge has held — that COVID 19 changes everything. In no uncertain terms, that means that Judge Childs’ order will not be enforced until after the Sixth Circuit has heard and decided the appeal of her Order by election officials in South Carolina. That won’t be happening in only four weeks — but just in case it does, the order won’t go into effect if upheld until disposition on a petition for writ of certiorari is heard and disposed of in the Supreme Court — and that is CERTAIN to not happen in the next four weeks. Related: South Carolina: 2020-10-04 Left Wing Governor Of Washington State Freaks Out As Boeing Moves Production To South Carolina South Carolina: 2020-10-03 The Obituary This Woman Wrote For Her Dog Is Guaranteed To Make You Cry South Carolina: 2020-10-02 Boeing announces 787 production moving to South Carolina in 2021 |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #7 But didn't I see that the Michigan AG (another liberal female Democrat) say that she would not enforce any of the governor's orders? That's right; that was announced a day or so after the MI SC handed down its ruling. Almost makes me proud I live in Maskachusetts instead! |
| Posted by: Raj 2020-10-06 12:23 |
| #6 If they ignore them, send in federal SWAT teams to arrest them for violating citizens civil rights under the color of law. |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2020-10-06 12:23 |
| #5 #3 My $'s on Whitmer ignoring the courts first - she just lost a court case w/ the MI Supreme Court invalidating her state of emergency Correct. That dead doll-eyed witch vowed to oppose the law "vehemently" - code word for extra-legally, "by any means necessary" yadda yadda Echoes of southern nullifier seggy gub'nahs. Another George Wallace, except uglier and more ignorant |
| Posted by: Tholulet Bonaparte9889 2020-10-06 12:01 |
| #4 But didn't I see that the Michigan AG (another liberal female Democrat) say that she would not enforce any of the governor's orders? Perhaps setting herself up for a primary challenge next time around? |
| Posted by: Tom 2020-10-06 11:37 |
| #3 My $'s on Whitmer ignoring the courts first - she just lost a court case w/ the MI Supreme Court invalidating her state of emergency, which for some strange reason the court said could continue for three more weeks. |
| Posted by: Raj 2020-10-06 11:14 |
| #2 I'm just waiting for the governors to start ignoring the courts. That is the next step. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2020-10-06 08:50 |
| #1 I'm sure there's a federal judge in Hawaii who's ready to try overruling SCOTUS. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-10-06 07:54 |