You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Woke Royals' U.S. Election Interference 'Violation' of Megxit Deal: Claim
2020-09-28
[BREITBART] The decision by Los Angeles-based Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to wade into the upcoming U.S. election by offering voting advice was a “violation” of their “Megxit” deal with the Queen and could further jeopardise their links to the monarchy, it was claimed Sunday by senior royal aides.
Oh well.
According to the Times newspaper, courtiers have been canvassing how the royal household could separate itself further from the pair.

The distance is required after the couple called on voters in America to “reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity” in “the most important election of our lifetime” — comments widely interpreted as a swipe at President Donald Trump.
She wears pretty clothes well, but otherwise is anyone interested in the silly things she thinks about anything?
The two spoke during an ABC broadcast special unveiling of the 2020 TIME 100, TIME’s list of the world’s 100 most influential people on Tuesday — National Voter Registration Day.

Markle is about to make history as the first British royal family member to publicly be known to exercise their right to vote, noted TIME.

Trump slammed Markle from the White House podium after the video message was released, while offering an observation of his own on the couple and their marriage.

“I’m not a fan of hers,” Trump said of the actress. “I would say this – and she has probably heard that – I wish a lot of luck to Harry because he’s going to need it.”
‘Struth.
Although Prince Harry will be unable to vote as he is not a U.S. citizen, he feels less constrained when it comes to offering his own advice on climate and other matters.
Related:
Meghan Markle: 2020-04-05 Prince Charles Will Reportedly Cover Part of Harry and Meghan's Security Costs after Trump Refuses
Meghan Markle: 2020-04-01 Coronavirus: The California Herd
Meghan Markle: 2020-03-30 Good afternoon
Posted by:Fred

#10  "Look at me! Look at me! Look at MEEEEEEEEE! I'm still relevant and important!!!:
Posted by: Tom   2020-09-28 15:36  

#9  Trump should ignore them. Small fish hoping to be important like the Twitter brigade. Trump acknowledging them gives them far more attention then they would have otherwise.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2020-09-28 13:29  

#8  Have you figured it out Harry?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-09-28 13:27  

#7  Trump must thank that airhead for the best promo he could get from entitled establishment parasites.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2020-09-28 12:09  

#6  Who's influenced by these shitheads?

Morons.

Especially female ones.

Of which there plenty on the voter rolls.
Posted by: charger   2020-09-28 11:55  

#5  "Most influential people"??
Who's influenced by these shitheads?
Posted by: Herman Guelph5038   2020-09-28 10:46  

#4  Who knew we'd have to fight The War of Independence Two as well as Civil War Two?

Or is it Three for both, if you count 1812 and the fact that the first WOI had aspects of a civil war itself?.
Posted by: charger   2020-09-28 09:52  

#3  How long until the sex video gets "leaked"?
Posted by: Uloter Ebbomolet9368   2020-09-28 09:41  

#2  She seems about as bright as a box of broken light bulbs.

Therefore the press will gush over her every word.
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-09-28 09:00  

#1  I will “reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity” in “the most important election of our lifetime” when I vote for Trump.
Posted by: Bobby   2020-09-28 07:47  

00:00