| Submit your comments on this article |
| Fifth Column |
| If your cause requires bullying to get the message across, perhaps it isn't as righteous as you think it is. |
| 2020-09-08 |
| [DiogenesMiddleFinger] The difference between leftwing ’activism’ and the zombie apocalypse gets smaller by the day. If your cause requires bullying to get the message across perhaps it, and your defence of it, isn’t as righteous as you think it is. But I suppose it depends on whether you’re amused by making people miss flights and hospital appointments, or job interviews, or thwarting parents’ attempts to collect their children from school. That kind of thing. And regardless of the pretext offered on any given day, you do have to marvel at the moral vacancy of it all. Apparently, it isn’t hard to understand that the way to make people sympathetic with your cause, whatever it may be this week, is to screw them over, because you can, and then applaud yourself for doing so. Somewhat harder to understand is that go-to solution, of which they so proud — i.e., the gratuitous trapping of motorists, is a moral non sequitur and rather like saying, "I’m troubled by the plight of the Javan rhinoceros, so I’m going to start spitting at the elderly and keying random cars, and then boast about it." The Obstructing-Traffic-And-Frustrating-Random-People-While-Feeling-Immensely-Self-Satisfied Thing™ first came to our attention during the Occupy (enter cause celeb) fad and it rapidly degenerated into opportunist thuggery and self-indulgent farce. A high point being when a Mao-ling mother placed her four-year-old daughter on active train tracks. Since then, in the name of "teaching others to care," we’ve seen self-righteous mobs deliberately blocking the paths of ambulances and giving paramedics the finger, while exulting in their power to alarm, frustrate and coerce. And to endanger lives with collective impunity. And we’ve seen fearless, selfless anti-Trump protestors surrounding and terrorising a lone female driver by trying to smash her car’s windshield, and videoing her distress for their own amusement and peer-group cred. And at which point, what you’re seeing isn’t politics or protest. It’s sociopathy. We’ve also seen Mao-lings in running into traffic on a highway because terrorising random motorists is the woke thing to do, apparently. And when one of them gets hurt - which will tend to happen if you swarm onto a motorway in the dark, the Mao-lings will immediately started blaming someone else, anyone but the people who actually chose to run into the path of oncoming traffic. And of course we’ve seen things like these items here and many others in the archives. All done in the name of forcing others to be compassionate. And comply. Because Random People Must Be Punished. |
| Posted by:746 |
| #11 Trying to shame sociopaths is a fool's errand. |
| Posted by: charger 2020-09-08 18:10 |
| #10 Well, I did a stint as corporal instructor in basic ... Formative training for Academia. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2020-09-08 16:01 |
| #9 If your cause requires bullying to get the message across, perhaps it isn't as righteous as you think it is. Well, I did a stint as corporal instructor in basic ... |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-09-08 13:08 |
| #8 "Are We the baddies?" (Youtube) |
| Posted by: magpie 2020-09-08 12:45 |
| #7 Here's a hint, when you ACT like Nazi's...it means you are one. And try this outside of a liberal sh*thole, and expect a violent and brutal response. Texas Law: A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property: (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41 ;  and (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime;  or (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property;  and (3) he reasonably believes that: (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means;  or (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2020-09-08 10:40 |
| #5 If your cause involves lobbying the government to force others to validate your life choices, it's a questionable cause. If the government actually get involved in coercing people to validate other people's life choices, it's a questionable government. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-09-08 08:55 |
| #4 The difference between leftwing ’activism’ and the zombie apocalypse gets smaller by the day You just noticed that? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-09-08 06:50 |
| #2 This is destabilization, the necessary precursor to revolution. Of course they're attacking random strangers who have nothing to do with it. That's the whole idea. Whoever wrote this never watched Yuri Berezomov. |
| Posted by: Muggsy Hapsburg5230 2020-09-08 04:34 |
| #1 "The means justify the end!" "Exactly what is the desired end?" "Dunno. But I'm angry! I'll figure out something later." |
| Posted by: gorb 2020-09-08 02:35 |