You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-PC Follies
Journalism's Gates keepers
2020-08-27

[ColumbiaJournalismReview] Last August, NPR profiled a Harvard-led experiment to help low-income families find housing in wealthier neighborhoods, giving their children access to better schools and an opportunity to "break the cycle of poverty." According to researchers cited in the article, these children could see $183,000 greater earnings over their lifetimes—a striking forecast for a housing program still in its experimental stage.

If you squint as you read the story, you’ll notice that every quoted expert is connected to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which helps fund the project. And if you’re really paying attention, you’ll also see the editor’s note at the end of the story, which reveals that NPR itself receives funding from Gates.

NPR’s funding from Gates "was not a factor in why or how we did the story," reporter Pam Fessler says, adding that her reporting went beyond the voices quoted in her article. The story, nevertheless, is one of hundreds NPR has reported about the Gates Foundation or the work it funds, including myriad favorable pieces written from the perspective of Gates or its grantees.

And that speaks to a larger trend—and ethical issue—with billionaire philanthropists’ bankrolling the news. The Broad Foundation, whose philanthropic agenda includes promoting charter schools, at one point funded part of the LA Times’ reporting on education. Charles Koch has made charitable donations to journalistic institutions such as the Poynter Institute, as well as to news outlets such as the Daily Caller, that support his conservative politics. And the Rockefeller Foundation funds Vox’s Future Perfect, a reporting project that examines the world "through the lens of effective altruism"—often looking at philanthropy.

As philanthropists increasingly fill in the funding gaps at news organizations—a role that is almost certain to expand in the media downturn following the coronavirus pandemic—an underexamined worry is how this will affect the ways newsrooms report on their benefactors. Nowhere does this concern loom larger than with the Gates Foundation, a leading donor to newsrooms and a frequent subject of favorable news coverage.

I recently examined nearly twenty thousand charitable grants the Gates Foundation had made through the end of June and found more than $250 million going toward journalism. Recipients included news operations like the BBC, NBC, Al Jazeera, ProPublica, National Journal, The Guardian, Univision, Medium, the Financial Times, The Atlantic, the Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, and the Center for Investigative Reporting; charitable organizations affiliated with news outlets, like BBC Media Action and the New York Times’ Neediest Cases Fund; media companies such as Participant, whose documentary Waiting for "Superman" supports Gates’s agenda on charter schools; journalistic organizations such as the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, the National Press Foundation, and the International Center for Journalists; and a variety of other groups creating news content or working on journalism, such as the Leo Burnett Company, an ad agency that Gates commissioned to create a "news site" to promote the success of aid groups. In some cases, recipients say they distributed part of the funding as subgrants to other journalistic organizations—which makes it difficult to see the full picture of Gates’s funding into the fourth estate....
Related:
Gates Foundation: 2020-08-22 UK Officials Inflated COVID Hospital Numbers at Height of ‘Pandemic'
Gates Foundation: 2020-08-13 Digital ID, Bill Gates vaccine record, and payments system combo to be trialed in Africa
Gates Foundation: 2020-07-01 Global Hydroxychloroquine Study To Resume After Positive Trial Results
Posted by:Clem

#10  That's CP/M AlanC. And it's multi-user big brother MP/M. I think I still have a couple of computers running CP/M. Microsoft wrote a lot of compilers (BASIC, FORTRAN, Assembler, etc..) and stuff for CP/M before MS-DOS came along.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-08-27 17:29  

#9  #7 - I understand the pricey Surface 3's are selling pretty well. Even the off-brand tablet I got at Amazon (<<$) uses Win 10
Posted by: Frank G   2020-08-27 15:52  

#8  Anyone else remember CPM?

And yes WNT had aspects of VMS....it was no coincidence that NT is VMS right shifted logical.

You can thank the great God Cutler of DEC. He ran from Maynard to Seattle cause the 64 bit version of VMS was cancelled.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-08-27 14:45  

#7  ...MS got cut out of the tablet market because they wouldn't listen to people who didn't want bloatware for their internet experience and entertainment.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-08-27 13:26  

#6  Dont' forget how Gates would lock competition out of the OS market. If you were a hardware manufactured and offered a choice of OS'es - the price per unit for MS-DOS would go *way* up and you wouldn't be able to compete. You could only price match your competition if you only offered MS-DOS.
Even IBM often could not offer OS/2 on their own hardware.
And didn't NT have aspects of VMS in it?
(I think Microsoft the company has matured past that with the current CEO. Visual Studio on Mac? .NET on Mac and Linux?)
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-08-27 09:59  

#5  My first PC ran on DR. That was just before IBM declared they were going to get into the business. The story I heard was IBM was shopping for a OS for their new toy. When the IBM reps showed up at DR, management was out on the golf course. The reps moved on to Seattle.

Similar story about fast food on military installations. The Army put out a request for bids. McD's thought they had it sown up. Burger King got the contract and is still there. When the Air Force followed suit, management got serious.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-08-27 08:56  

#4  

My computer tech friend who turned me on to Linux years ago has such detest for MS and its "virus breeding hell hole" that he writes [w]indows and [m]icrosoft in lower case.
Posted by: Clem   2020-08-27 08:44  

#3  Also, look at how it got his first OS contract with IBM just before DOS 1.0.

I'll always remember how he fucked over Digital Research with Windows 3.11 - it wouldn't install on top of DR DOS, so at the time I had to go back to original DOS to finish the Windows install. Digital Research was bankrupt at some point thereafter.
Posted by: Raj   2020-08-27 07:49  

#2  Same for when he tried to use FUD against Linux and paid for the Mormon's and Gore's old pet lawyer to try to steal it....

Also, look at how it got his first OS contract with IBM just before DOS 1.0.
Posted by: 3dc   2020-08-27 06:12  

#1  When a man's computer operating system has been a virus breeding hell hole for 40 years why would anybody expect his treatment of human viruses would be any better?
Posted by: 3dc   2020-08-27 06:09  

00:00