| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Signs, Portents, and the Weather- |
| A COVID Doctor is challenging CNN's @ChrisCuomo and Dr. Fauci to take a urine test to prove they aren't taking Hydroxychloroquine |
| 2020-07-28 |
[GatewayPundit] Frontline doctors from across the US held a "White Coat Summit" on Monday in Washington DC to dispel the misinformation and myths surrounding the Coronavirus. The fake news media, including CNN, NBC, CBS, WaPO and NY Times all waged a war on Hydroxychloroquine just because Trump touted the anti-malaria drug as an effective treatment for COVID-19. Dr. Stella Immanuel said on Monday that she has personally treated over 350 patients with COVID-19 with Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Zithromax and they have all recovered. The doctor also disclosed that she put herself and her staff on Hydroxychloroquine as a preventative. Dr. Immanuel challenged CNN’s Chris Cuomo and Fauci to take a urine test to prove they aren’t taking Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylaxis for COVID-19. Frontline doctors from across the US held a "White Coat Summit" on Monday in Washington DC to dispel the misinformation and myths surrounding the coronavirus. The doctors are very concerned with the disinformation campaign being played out in the far left American media today. From their website: "If Americans continue to let so-called experts and media personalities make their decisions, the great American experiment of a Constitutional Republic with Representative Democracy, will cease." |
| Posted by:Woodrow |
| #10 Ummmmm |
| Posted by: European Conservative 2020-07-28 21:17 |
| #9 ...testing for specific viruses? Stupid brain fart... |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2020-07-28 16:05 |
| #8 Really, all one have to do is blow their nose before the test and the test (if accurate) will show negative. The nose is a good filtering system and a nose test isn't going to show whether a person has the virus or not. Blood test is more accurate, but then again, just how are they testing for specific tests?. AFDAICT, they have no idea how to test for COVID-19 specifically and not some other virus. |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2020-07-28 16:03 |
| #7 ^ This |
| Posted by: Frank G 2020-07-28 15:12 |
| #6 however there are 'HCQ is not effective' studies that seem legit My takeaway is that the studies show HQC is not effective on its own against this thing lord garth, nor is it effective when the disease is severe or advanced. It is best in the early stages or as a prophylactic when given in combination with zinc and azithromycin or another antibiotic. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2020-07-28 14:40 |
| #5 #4 Garth, clinical trials is not science. They're more like opinion polls. You formulate the "right" questions, you get the "right" conclusions. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-07-28 14:08 |
| #4 however there are 'HCQ is not effective' studies that seem legit maybe there are enough differences between the various regional strains of the virus to account for this difference in results |
| Posted by: lord garth 2020-07-28 13:23 |
| #3 we now know that the data used in the Lancet study of HCQ was hosed |
| Posted by: lord garth 2020-07-28 12:45 |
| #2 Between that and Dexamethasone, it seems we have a relatively effective general treatment that resolves a majority of cases quickly and favorably, and cheaply since all the medications involved are generic. Put your timfoil hat on, but maybe thats why the pushback, in addition to the virulent Anti-Trump Disorder: Lots of pols are in the pay of major pharma companies, and they dont stand to make a dime off generic treatments. Its likely no THE reason, but certainly amongst the reasons for the dominant liberal media and leftist pols attacks on this treatment. |
| Posted by: Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-07-28 02:34 |
| #1 I'd add all the conservative "experts" minimizing the threat of Covid 19 to the list of tested for HCQ traces - might be very interesting. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-07-28 01:31 |