You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Biden task force backs ‘postal banking' system as experts balk
2020-07-16
[Washington Examiner] The Unity Task Force created by presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has called for a "postal banking" system for people who don’t have access to regular banks, while experts and government reports pan the idea.

"I do not think it is the solution to improving the reach of financial services in our country," said Carrie Hunt, executive vice president of government affairs and general counsel for the National Association of Federally Insured Credit Unions.

Hunt is not alone in her assessment.

The Government Accountability Office, which audits the federal government, released a report in March that tapped the opinions of postal service officials and other stakeholders about the U.S. Postal Service adding banking to its amenities list and deemed that the post office "may not have the expertise nor the required capital" to pull it off.

The report also stated that the idea "may generate minimal revenue" as the post office seeks new income streams as it reported revenue losses of over $8 billion last fiscal year. This isn’t the first time that the agency has reported such losses.

The Postal Times reported on Friday that "over the past 14 years, the United States Postal Service (USPS) has lost $78.5 billion and now has $143 billion in unfunded liabilities. No one should be inspired enough by that performance to allow the agency to handle anyone’s money."

The Treasury Department also opposes granting the post office the power to provide financial services because of its limited capital reserves and lack of experience in the banking sector.

Its report from December 2018 stated that "given the USPS’s narrow expertise and capital limitations, USPS should not pursue expanding into new sectors, such as postal banking."
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  The ad boys have come up with a great slogan:

"Let us go postal with your money!"
Posted by: charger   2020-07-16 19:44  

#5  Do I need to put a /real on that?
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-07-16 09:40  

#4  Change bulk rate to normal rate postage.

That will reduce the number of items, deliveries and handlers...also save trees!
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-07-16 09:39  

#3  Let's get over it boys and girls. The Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 says Congress shall have the power to -

To establish post offices and post roads;

It's says nothing about profitability. Please use Article V to remove that if you believe you know better than the founders in a means of linking the country together that is not subject to private control (see today's media). It doesn't give Congress exclusive control, but says it will establish and run it.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-07-16 07:33  

#2  The Postal Times reported on Friday that "over the past 14 years, the United States Postal Service (USPS) has lost $78.5 billion and now has $143 billion in unfunded liabilities. No one should be inspired enough by that performance to allow the agency to handle anyone’s money."

Insofar as it goes, true. But an appreciable chunk of that is the fact that Congress, always willing to bribe voters and let someone else pay for it, pulled this stunt:

"In 2006, Congress passed a law that imposed extraordinary costs on the U.S. Postal Service. The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) required the USPS to create a $72 billion fund to pay for the cost of its post-retirement health care costs, 75 years into the future. This burden applies to no other federal agency or private corporation.

If the costs of this retiree health care mandate were removed from the USPS financial statements, the Post Office would have reported operating profits in each of the last six years. This extraordinary mandate created a financial “crisis” that has been used to justify harmful service cuts and even calls for postal privatization."


More at the link.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2020-07-16 06:45  

#1  "may not have the expertise nor the required capital" to pull it off.

Perhaps if they handed off their failing mail delivery duties to UPS, FedEx, or Amazon ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-07-16 04:41  

00:00