You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails
2020-06-15
[American Thinker] Amid the chaos and anarchy across blue-city America that exclusively possessed public attention for the last couple of weeks, it was not hard to miss any other bit of news — especially if that news has not appeared or been even briefly mentioned by any major mainstream media outlet. Take for example the news of Hillary Clinton, who lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on June 2, where she tried to avoid testifying under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case.

The hearing in the D.C. Circuit came in the case Judicial Watch v. Clinton, a public records case involving a request for State Department documents and communication about the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack.

The case also involves Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state. Judicial Watch, a conservative activist watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, uncovered another 756 pages of emails the FBI was able to retrieve that were part of Hillary Clinton's unsecured server revealing communications between some prominent Washington figures and classified emails sent by former prime minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair. The emails were part of the batch "Clinton tried to delete or destroy," Judicial Watch stated in its press release. It showed that Clinton had asked Blair to continue using her private email after her confirmation and also revealed that Blair was sending classified information on her unsecured server. Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified information, as ex—FBI director James Comey carefully and rather mildly concluded in July 2016, announcing there would be no charges against her. Judicial Watch did not drop the case.

On June 2, Clinton's lawyers challenged a March 2 order from U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, who ordered Clinton to testify:
Related:
Hillary Clinton: 2020-06-07 Biden proclaims that 10 to 15 percent of Americans "are just not very good people"
Hillary Clinton: 2020-06-07 Hillary Clinton asks appeals court to help her dodge Judicial Watch deposition on emails and Benghazi
Hillary Clinton: 2020-06-04 Rosenstein says he wouldn’t approve Russia warrant now
Related:
Benghazi: 2020-06-13 Shura council of Benghazi leader Ziad Balam alive in Istanbul after having his leg amputated after he was injured fighting for the GNA
Benghazi: 2020-06-08 Sirte roundup: Turkish-backed forces reach city-center of Sirte after fierce battle, or perhaps not...
Benghazi: 2020-06-07 Hillary Clinton asks appeals court to help her dodge Judicial Watch deposition on emails and Benghazi
Related:
Judicial Watch: 2020-06-07 Hillary Clinton asks appeals court to help her dodge Judicial Watch deposition on emails and Benghazi
Judicial Watch: 2020-06-06 Head of the Snake
Judicial Watch: 2020-05-27 In a first, Twitter adds fact-check warnings to ‘unsubstantiated’ Trump tweets
Posted by:Besoeker

#19  OMG... Its as if they are reaching out to devour you... scary.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-06-15 20:15  

#18  One of the things I "hate" about Rantburg is when I come up with some good snark I realize that someone else has already posted it.
Posted by: European Conservative   2020-06-15 18:55  

#17  You're all welcome. I'll go to my room...soon
Posted by: Frank G   2020-06-15 18:46  

#16  the pants: all lines lead to ugh
Posted by: Bob Grorong1136   2020-06-15 18:12  

#15  A sick, nasty, old harridan.
Posted by: Clem   2020-06-15 18:01  

#14  re #12

Those pants remind me of my college days.....but I thought it was the acid.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-06-15 17:29  

#13  #11 Is that a young Hillary. Wow! A real kitsune!
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-06-15 16:47  

#12  Arrrrggghhh! The Pants!

*screams*
*throws self out of office onto street*
*office has no windows*
Posted by: swksvolFF   2020-06-15 15:49  

#11  #9 - Good call
Posted by: Frank G   2020-06-15 13:28  

#10  Any guess into how many times she will have to say that she has no clear recollection? Given that Cheryl Mills also has to testify under oath, this has the making of a world class Alzheimer’s convention.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-06-15 13:05  

#9  She lost her appeal 40 years ago

I'd call that snark of the day but then I must ask, when did she ever have any?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-06-15 12:26  

#8  Ask her the questions that you already have the answers. And then catch her in lie after lie.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2020-06-15 11:50  

#7  Lost her appeal? Her only attractive force is gravitational in nature.
Posted by: Warthog   2020-06-15 11:39  

#6  #3 for early SNOD nod.
Posted by: Raj   2020-06-15 10:02  

#5  "I don't recall"
Posted by: Frank G   2020-06-15 08:30  

#4  Judicial Watch doing more than any AG under Trump.
Posted by: Clem   2020-06-15 07:57  

#3  She lost her appeal 40 years ago
Posted by: Galactic Coordinator Borgia3067   2020-06-15 07:50  

#2  He'll probably be hit by a stray aircraft that just suddenly appeared and smashes into his house without anybody on board.
Posted by: Vernal Hatrick   2020-06-15 07:33  

#1  The head of Judicial Watch had better double his security, and that of his family. Stay off aircraft, always travel in a t least 2 vehicles, and stay the hell awa from Forty Marcy Park.
Posted by: Greater the Anonymous5721   2020-06-15 04:51  

00:00