You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Former US Moscow COS has nothing good to say about former boss John Brennan
2020-05-02
[Just The News] Former CIA Moscow station Chief Daniel Hoffman laid into his former boss at Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, during an interview with Just the News.

"One of the things that bothers me the most is when someone kind of starts with their answer, and then they try to twist the facts to fit it," Hoffman said Tuesday. "I saw Brennan do that when I served under him CIA. And I saw him do it when he was, you know, a contributor at MSNBC accusing the president of treason with nothing whatsoever to back it up."

The former station chief said that Brennan's behavior related to the Russia collusion narrative was not much different than what he witnessed during his time serving under him at the CIA, the country's top spy agency.

"There were policies he supported, whether it was the policy in Syria or Iran. And when you told him something that would force him to challenge his assumptions, his response was just to get mad at you and not really want to hear what you have to say," Hoffman said.

Hoffman called Brennan's public behavior since leaving his CIA post an "extraordinary dereliction of duty."

He accuses the former director of misleading the American people and members of Congress by publicly peddling an unsubstantiated narrative about Trump's involvement with the Russian government, as related to the 2016 White House race and investigated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

"If he had concerns about President Trump, then go tell you know, Bob Mueller about it. But you don't need to speak up publicly about stuff that isn't even true on MSNBC," Hoffman said.

The former CIA official took specific offense with Brennan pushing an unconfirmed narrative to a viewing audience that would believe what he had to say because of his elevated position in the intelligence community.

"I think viewers would have assumed that because Brennan was director of the CIA, he would know something that they don't and they probably believed him," Hoffman said. "I don't even know why he's still given the opportunity to be on air, after all of that."
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  You have to understand that Brennan revealing true classified information on MSNBC would be a crime. Thus he confines himself to telling lies about same, which is perfectly legal.
As a result you would come closest to the truth about anything he says by putting a 'not' in front of it.
Posted by: daniel    2020-05-02 23:04  

#7  It will be a happy day (if it ever comes) where we see that sumbitch Communist Brennan in an orange jumpsuit and chains.
Posted by: Marilyn Tojo7566   2020-05-02 18:16  

#6  There are some people you can beat, and beat and beat until they die. When you bring them back with the paddles and promise to start again, they will recant.

Others complete disassociate and will not recant upon recovery. These you just shoot like the mad dogs that they are.
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-05-02 15:39  

#5  "A Higher Loyalty"?
Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2020-05-02 12:02  

#4  he appears to be untouchable

J. Edgar Hoover route?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-05-02 07:36  

#3  How deep were his deputies, Avril Haines and
David Cohen
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-05-02 07:32  

#2  Brennan throws hissy fits. Surprise.
----------------
Hoffman's long experience observing Russian spies at work leads to a surprising conclusion about one of the most sensational revelations from last year's election: that Trump Tower meeting in June 2016. The one attended by Donald Trump Jr., Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign manager Paul Manafort — and Kremlin-connected Russians.

"To me," Hoffman says, "it pointed to a discoverable influence operation rather than some effort to establish a clandestine channel for collusion."
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-05-02 07:29  

#1  Nobody else has anything "good to say" about the SOB either, but much like the Hildebeest, Comey, Clapper, Wray, he appears to be untouchable.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-05-02 07:27  

00:00