| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Why Modern Feminism Wants To Get Rid Of The Family |
| 2020-03-10 |
| Evie magazine via Instapundit When I first stumbled upon this Vice article titled "We Can't Have a Feminist Future Without Abolishing the Family," I thought this was just another story about a lunatic, fringe, radical feminist. Vice is, after all, struggling to keep its lights on, so naturally they would resort to sensationalist click-bait type of stories in order to bolster their readership. Nothing sounds more outrageous than a feature story on a feminist thinker who calls for the abolishment of families, as well as the right to abortion (specifically as the justifiable killing of babies). ...When I tell people how the ideology of feminism is strongly rooted in Marxism, I’m often dismissed as being ignorantly sensationalist at best and maliciously slanderous at worst. So what qualifies me to make this claim? Well, for one, I was raised a Communist by my father. My father wasn’t one of those armchair philosophers who were Communist sympathizers because they took an introductory course on Marxist ideas in college or picked up Marx and Engels to seem cool among their intellectual friends. Rather, his family was part of the Chinese Communist resistance against Imperial Japan during the Japanese Occupation of British Malaya. ...When I saw the absolutely revolting video of Sophie Lewis defending abortion as a form of "justified killing," I immediately remembered the forced abortions carried out in Red China under Mao’s one-child policy. It was horrifying to hear a woman describing the process of pregnancy as "a fetus dealing out violence to the gestator (the mother)." ...Feminist theory states that the patriarchy is the reigning status quo of society. Therefore, to move towards a superior form of society, a revolution is necessary because women have to rise up and overthrow the patriarchy. Keep that thought in mind, and you will understand why the lunatic fringe of the radical feminist movement truly believe that they’re victims of the patriarchal oppression of the cis-gendered, straight, white male. ...When you favor a worldview that tends to dissolve the stability of the traditional family, there is going to be enough social breakdown that will call for more government intervention in a person’s personal life. Strong stable families will prevent the rise of socialism/Marxism because when a person has a strong support system behind them in the form of their family, they need not seek the help of the state. ...Radical Feminism is basically bootleg Marxism. But radical feminists are too chicken to go all out and advocate fully for Communism (like the Bernie Bros). Rather they depend on the support of unsuspecting women to back them up as they underhandedly push their insidious agenda. At least Mao Zedong tried to openly eliminate the concept of gender during China’s Cultural Revolution. To Mao, there was no difference between the man and the woman. Gender is "a social construct." The radical feminist shares this belief and wants to achieve the same genderless outcome as Mao. However, the feminist is employing their societal transformation discreetly, like a crooked conman stealing your money quietly through fraud (oh sorry, I didn’t mean to use sexist language, I meant ’conwoman’). And they’re doing so by working to destroy the family unit. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #4 Long before The People's Cube there was a parody book called The Job of Sex featuring a fat babushka lady done in Soviet Realism style. I tried to find a picture of the cover but no luck. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-03-10 17:48 |
| #3 Vice is just trying out different formulas in hopes of landing on a Woke version of Zero Hedge. A Hail |
| Posted by: Lex 2020-03-10 09:45 |
| #2 Are we going the way of the Shakers? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2020-03-10 09:34 |
| #1 Communist thought. Sex between anybody is no different than drinking a glass of water. Also, no more import. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2020-03-10 05:41 |