You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Future of abortion at stake in US Supreme Court case
2020-03-04
Washington (AFP) ‐ The United States Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear what may be its most significant case in decades on the controversial subject of abortion.
Naaaw...it'll just go back to the States, as it should
At issue is a state law in Louisiana which requires doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

Groups in favor of abortion argue that the law would severely restrict access to the practice and lead to the closure of two of three remaining abortion clinics in the southern state.

The case, June Medical Services v Russo, will be the first on the emotive issue to come before the court since President Donald Trump appointed two conservative justices ‐ Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh ‐ to the nine-member bench.

Their appointments have galvanized anti-abortion activists in the country’s conservative "Bible Belt," and several states have passed tough laws restricting the practice. A ban in Alabama even covered cases of rape.

That and most of those other laws have been struck down by lower courts, but anti-abortion groups are hoping to put the issue before the Supreme Court and force it to revisit Roe v. Wade.

"The case is significant because the law that is being challenged is more or less identical to one that the court struck down in 2016," said Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University.

"Switching court membership? Is that enough to undo a case?" asked Ziegler, author of "Beyond Abortion: Roe v Wade and the Battle for Privacy."
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  I'm amazed that the I am woman hear my roar crowd doesn't think women are strong enough to force their partners to use protection, or to pay for the abortion so the government doesn't have to. They should be insulted at the low expectations and push for people to step up their game.
Posted by: ruprecht   2020-03-04 20:33  

#3  Schumer unloads on Gorsuch, Kavanaugh at abortion rights rally: 'You will pay the price!'
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-03-04 17:25  

#2  (Fixing typos)

Lsat year in France a woman became sterile after her 17th (seventeenth) abortion in 6 years. That means that had she not become sterile she would have had about 50 abortions before menopause

I suspect she was engaging in the following game:

Woman gets pregnant on purpose. Hormonal changes make her more receptivve (in heat, if we are not diplomatic). It also makes her breasts grow bigger so her partner is more excited. Then they f.ck like rabbits. When she is about to reach the legal limit she has an abortion at no cost since abortions are free in France. Rinse and repeat

BTW. When you don't want babies there are condoms, contraceptives and mobile phones alarms to ensure you don't forget to take them so abortion is not about choice but about not wanting to care.
Posted by: JFM   2020-03-04 07:09  

#1  A woman became sterile after her 17th abortion in 6 years. That means that had she not become sterile whe would have had about 50 abortions before menopause

I suspect she was engaging in the following game..

Woman gets pregant on purpose. Houmal changes made her more receptibvve (in heat, if we are not dimpomatic). It also makes her biiger breasts so her partner is more excoted. So they f.ck like rabbits. When she is about to reach the legal limit she has an abortion (in France it zeo euros). Rinse and repeat

BTW. When you don't want babies there condoms contraceptives and mobile phones alarms to remind you to take them so it is not about choice but about not wanting to care.
Posted by: JFM   2020-03-04 05:58  

00:00