You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Pres. Trump budget calls for slashing funds to climate science centers
2020-02-21
[The Hill] President Trump’s budget proposes closing a network of climate science centers, prompting concerns the administration will hamstring climate change research while booting employees from the federal workforce.

Trump’s fiscal 2021 budget would slash funding for the National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers, eliminating all $38 million for research to help wildlife and humans "adapt to a changing climate."

Rather than fund all eight regional centers along with the national one, the budget instead calls for just one center, at a cost of $20 million.

The restructuring plans follow similar steps employed by the Trump administration, where agencies with research ties are reshuffled or relocated, often prompting a reduction in staff.

"They have a track record of doing this," said Aaron Weiss, deputy director at the Center for Western Priorities, an environmental watchdog group. "In a normal administration, you wouldn't blow up eight other regional climate centers without going through Congress. I don't know exactly what they’re going to do, but, this being their wishlist, I won't be surprised if they try to put some of it into action without approval from Congress."

The administration previously moved two research wings of the Agriculture Department to Kansas City. One of those agencies, the Economic Research Service, lost nearly 80 percent of its nearly 200-plus person staff and had trouble producing required reports.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  Replace them all with one thermometer
Posted by: bbrewer126    2020-02-21 17:50  

#10  I hear he needs the money to send all the climate scientists to combat climate change... on mars.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2020-02-21 12:20  

#9  These idiots aren't scientists, they are rent chasers. Grants and Foundation money is only given to those who march in step. Control is the agenda.

We have ice core samples now that you never hear about because they are quite revealing of the hoax, and past cataclysms for the matter.

Climate is a cycle of glacial vs post interglacial periods, the most recent being the Holocene.
Posted by: mossomo   2020-02-21 11:56  

#8  New tests under Antarctica's 'doomsday' Thwaites glacier reveals it has 'warm water welling up under it from THREE different directions' threatening to destroy the ice sheet and raise global sea levels by up to two feet
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-02-21 10:06  

#7  George and Amal Clooney's mansion is surrounded by flood water: £12m Grade-II listed home becomes submerged after Storm Dennis
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-02-21 10:00  

#6  NASA announces new program to study flooding in the Mississippi River Delta outside of New Orleans, where 5,000 square miles of land has been lost to rising sea levels since the 1930s
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-02-21 09:59  

#5  ...while booting employees from the federal workforce.

Said as though it's a bad thing.
Posted by: Raj   2020-02-21 09:48  

#4  In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.


Eisenhower's farewell address
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-02-21 07:20  

#3  #1 I would also recommend slashing the leading "scientific" lights in that field - with a knout, for every gross distortion of known facts in their papers.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-02-21 02:53


I'd recommend a cudgel myself, but I'm kinda traditional that way.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2020-02-21 06:37  

#2  Do they know how much paper it takes to make a stack of $ bills ? The ink and printing itself ?
Posted by: Dron66046   2020-02-21 06:25  

#1  I would also recommend slashing the leading "scientific" lights in that field - with a knout, for every gross distortion of known facts in their papers.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-21 02:53  

00:00