You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers: Doyle, Moynihan vs. IRS
2020-02-11
[Zero] In a December 2018 Congressional hearing on Not-for-Profit Charities with a Specific Case Study on the Clinton Foundation, our nation was introduced to two private individuals who had undertaken a multi-year investigative probe of the 43rd President's foundation.

Larry Doyle and John Moynihan informed those observing that they filed a formal Whistleblower Submission replete with a hundred-plus formal exhibits in excess of 6,000 pages of evidence with the Internal Revenue Service on the Clinton Foundation in August 2017. They further testified that they had submitted the same materials to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and selected US Attorneys in the Department of Justice as well and that their documents included:

  • reviews of the foundation's tax returns and those of the foundation's donors

  • reviews including audits of the foundation's programs and operations, foreign and domestic

  • email exchanges between foundation executives and foreign government officials

  • contracts with foreign governments and engagements with other public and private entities

  • reviews of partnerships with an array of private companies, private universities, and other 501c3 public charities

  • interviews with both current and former senior Clinton Foundation officials

  • reviews of state registration materials

  • documents covering the foundation's own internal reviews

    During the hearing, Doyle and Moynihan highlighted that they believe the evidence they presented in their submission provided probable cause that the Clinton Foundation violated IRS codes relating to the Organization and Operational Tests for a 501c3 public charity with specific details addressing Misrepresentations and Misuse of Donated Public Funds. On top of that, they also addressed their probable cause assertion that the Clinton Foundation acted as an agent in violation of IRS code and the Foreign Agent Registration Act. These whistleblowers also highlighted that private foundations, including the Gates Foundation, that have donated to the Clinton Foundation are themselves subject to taxation based on IRS codes relating to Donors' Responsibilities. Ultimately, Doyle and Moynihan maintained that the Clinton Foundation could be subject to paying tax on anywhere from $400mm to potentially as much as $2.5 billion of revenue.
  • Posted by:Besoeker

    #15  Mormon Church 'is hoarding $100 BILLION in tax-exempt donations to be used in the event of Christ's second coming', claims whistleblower who wants an IRS bounty for 'exposing tax evasion'
    Posted by: Skidmark   2020-02-11 12:17  

    #14  ^ seconded.
    Tia,
    L.
    Posted by: Lex   2020-02-11 11:52  

    #13  Please delete that graphic. I might not be able to get to the bathroom in time and I don't want to barf on the carpet.
    Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-02-11 11:45  

    #12  Wish them well, but this truly seems like tilting at windmills. I would not bet against Team Clinton on this one.

    Their only hope would be to find an honest non Clinton- or Obama- or Bush-appointed judge... good luck.
    Posted by: Lex   2020-02-11 11:37  

    #11  Doyle and Moynihan stand to have a huge payday if they are successful. They get a percentage of whatever they uncover in the way of theft.

    Generally, 10% of the tax that's collected is what the reward originator (my term for it) receives for successfully dropping a dime. I know, because I had to wait seven years for mine.

    Oh - and good luck getting the Clintons to fork over anything.
    Posted by: Raj   2020-02-11 10:56  

    #10  /\ He was responding to a g(r)om jab that I made and deleted regarding the pron graphic. I jab him now and then to made sure he's still participating.
    Posted by: Besoeker   2020-02-11 10:34  

    #9  "#6" was a comment, now removed, by Besoeker.
    Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-11 10:32  

    #8  "Don't pluck the chicken?"
    Posted by: JohnQC   2020-02-11 10:30  

    #7  #6 Moenie die hoender ruk nie.
    Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-11 10:14  

    #6  I've been watching this for some time. Nothing has happened yet. Maybe something will happen this time.

    Doyle and Moynihan stand to have a huge payday if they are successful. They get a percentage of whatever they uncover in the way of theft.

    Charles Ortel has a website as well where much of this has been documented.

    Huber, DOJ attorney out in Utah, has not been able to find anything so far according to reports. His role is uncertain in this. Head fake, afraid of Arkancide, can't find the evidence of malfeasance, lack of interest, part of the Deepstate; take your pick.
    Posted by: JohnQC   2020-02-11 10:13  

    #5  as long as neither of them becomes POTUS #46

    In 2028 you mean? :-)
    Posted by: gorb   2020-02-11 08:50  

    #4  If all nonprofits were reviewed by the IRS, many of them (i.e., well over half) wouldn't be around anymore. Just might be time to rethink this whole thing.
    Posted by: Raj   2020-02-11 08:41  

    #3  /\ "At this point, what difference does it make"....as long as neither of them becomes POTUS #46.
    Posted by: Besoeker   2020-02-11 05:52  

    #2  Clinton is POTUS 42, not 43
    Posted by: lord garth   2020-02-11 05:35  

    #1  "Lock her up!"
    Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-11 05:08  

    00:00