You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Wisconsin judge orders commission to purge up to 209,000 names from voter rolls
2020-01-14
"Vote Fraud B Us: Dems"
[FoxNews] A Wisconsin judge on Monday found the state's Elections Commission and three of its members in contempt of court and ordered the commission to remove up to 209,000 names from the state's voter rolls, in a case that could have major implications later this year in a key battleground state.

Saying in his ruling that "time is of the essence," Judge Paul Malloy said that there is no time to wait for the case to make its way to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and ordered that the state pay $50 a day until it starts removing people from the voter rolls.

Malloy also ordered that the three Democrats on the commission ‐ Ann Jacobs, Julie Glancy and Mark Thomsen ‐ pay $250 a day each. The state Justice Department asked Malloy to stay his order of contempt pending an appeal of his ruling, but the judge denied the request.

"I can't be any clearer than this," Malloy said, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "They need to follow my order."

The case is being closely tracked on a national level, as Wisconsin is one of the most politically prized states up for grabs in this year's presidential election. President Trump won the state by fewer than 23,000 votes in 2016, becoming the first Republican to win Wisconsin since 1984, after Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton infamously failed to campaign in the state. Democrats are trying to remedy their loss this election season by holding the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee this summer and aggressively targeting voters in the Badger State.

State Democrats in Wisconsin are fighting the lawsuit, saying the purge would unfairly affect their voters. Republicans, however, argue that they merely want to ensure that people who have moved are not able to vote from their old addresses.
Posted by:Frank G

#11  Trump now has as much as 30% African-American support. Even if he only gets 20% if the A-A vote, there's no way any Dem can win with those numbers.

The Dem nominee for POTUS must get all or nearly all the A-A vote in Milwaukee, Cleveland, Detroit if he or she is to win WI, OH or MI respectively.
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-14 22:40  

#10  Nope, put on hold!
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-01-14 21:31  

#9  I don't know if Wisconsin is all that red. I suspect an awful lot of people wanted Bernie, and sat out Hillary last go-round. Milwaukee, Madison, ... big population centers are pretty socialist, and are much easier to organize get-out-the-vote efforts--including above-board versions.
Posted by: James   2020-01-14 18:27  

#8  No, Raj. They wouldn't use the whole list, only what would be necessary to give them a 3% advantage AFTER the polls close.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2020-01-14 13:32  

#7  ...to remove up to 209,000 names from the state's voter rolls

So that's what, 208,750 Democrat votes they lost?
Posted by: Raj   2020-01-14 09:04  

#6  If you vote locally, you'd better be prepared to file your state and federal income taxes locally.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-01-14 08:40  

#5  AND vote 'absentee' in their parent's districts
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2020-01-14 08:04  

#4  Now if they can keep the out-of-state kids at UW-Madison and UW-Milwaukee from voting 'locally'.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2020-01-14 08:02  

#3  $250
Posted by: Frank G   2020-01-14 04:33  

#2  $50 a day - punishment indeed!
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-01-14 02:59  

#1  FL: Red.
OH: Red.
PA, MI: trending Red.
WI: trending now Red.
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-14 00:22  

00:00