You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Atlanta PD Will No Longer Chase Criminals If They Flee From Cops
2020-01-05
[Blue Lives Matter] Atlanta, GA ‐ Atlanta Police Chief Erika Shields announced on Friday that, effective immediately, the Atlanta Police Department has a "no-chase policy."

Chief Shields faced off with reporters after an internal email she sent out to the entire police department on Friday morning was leaked to the media.

In the email, the chief pointed to the failure of the judicial system as a key reason for changing the department’s chase policy, WGCL reported.
A 'judicial system' based on white man's law is obviously destined to fail.
She told reporters the same thing.

"I don’t want to see us cost someone their life in pursuit of an auto theft person or a burglar when the court’s not even going to hold them accountable," Chief Shields said. "I mean how can we justify that? And I think we are better than that."

"It goes back to the repeat offender issue," the chief continued. "Okay, we get the person in custody and we look at how many times have we arrested them?"

"If nothing is happening to the individuals when we’re locking them up, and yet we’re absorbing this level of risk and liability ‐ I mean that just is not a good business model. I’d rather we put better emphasis on our investigative techniques," she told reporters.

Critics have called the policy change a knee-jerk reaction to criticism of the police department’s handling of incidents where civilians were seriously hurt or killed by suspects driving at high speeds to evade police, WGCL reported.

The chief explained that Atlanta PD having a restrictive chase policy was nothing new.

"Just to summarize, we’ve had a restrictive pursuit policy for many years... but we’ve had a few incidences when the officers are rightfully pursuing ‐ they’re in line with state law, they’re in line with policy ‐ but the pursuit itself is just not essential. Not given the risk reward that goes with engaging in a pursuit. And I just feel as though we need to step back and make the policy even more restrictive," Chief Shields said.
Posted by:Besoeker

#20  Reapers with Hellfires could solve the issue quite nicely. Honestly, any criminal convicted more than 3 times for felonies should be culled. N2 works, or H2S if you feel mean. Or 12 Gauge. Or a sledgehammer.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2020-01-05 22:50  

#19  It was costing thousands in dropped donuts.
Posted by: Dron66046   2020-01-05 14:32  

#18  #2 That was my initial reaction. But if that were really the situation, why would the street smart criminals bother to run in the first place?

Upon reflection, Erica's stated justification seems more of an excuse than the real reason. Upon which we can only speculate.
Posted by: The peanut gallery   2020-01-05 14:16  

#17  Copy of SFPD policy and expect the same crime stats to follow.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-01-05 11:35  

#16  ".... or I'll say, Mister, come on..."
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-05 11:25  

#15  "Stop! Or I'll say Stop! again..."
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-05 11:20  

#14  “You there, with the wide screen tv. Stop, or I’ll, uh, er, stop.”
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2020-01-05 11:13  

#13  What's the old saying? "Which is faster, radio waves or police cars?" Seems like training in closing a noose would be the way to go.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-01-05 11:03  

#12  P2k, smart ppl already get out of downtown Atl and head for the suburbs when it starts to get dark.
Posted by: Chris   2020-01-05 11:01  

#11  Unlikely perp runner's speed will exceed 1300 fps.
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-01-05 10:54  

#10  Flee = moving in any direction that takes the alleged away from the site of the alleged cri- infringement. Includes walking, scootering, crawling, riding in a rickshaw, sliding down a hill on a cafeteria tray, etc
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-05 10:48  

#9  Next comes the re-definition of 'flee'. Does the scu, uh, alleged perp have to run? Isn't that in and of itself stereotyping? Does rapid walking or a modest stroll qualify? How about waiting for public transport? Certainly that would indicate intent to relocate and after all you can't simply conjure a bus. Good idea all around.
Posted by: Cesare   2020-01-05 10:36  

#8  Don't chase, just send a little .30 - .45 calibre friend.
Posted by: Glenmore   2020-01-05 09:55  

#7  At what speed will Atlanta cops longer chase felons? A brisk walk or do both feet have to be off the ground at the same time? Asking for a friend.
Posted by: Hupaitle Lover of the Platypi3869   2020-01-05 08:56  

#6   I’d rather we put better emphasis on our investigative techniques," she told reporters.

So, you want to investigate them but not catch them, that right? Figure that's the way to protect your income stream with no risk from not doing your job?
Posted by: AlanC   2020-01-05 08:23  

#5  We have in my city had a few deaths when police have engaged in hot pursuit. Cars driving much too fast, too much tension and too recklessly.
Posted by: BernardZ   2020-01-05 06:09  

#4  I mean how can we justify that?

Because you want a civilization not anarchy. Wait till you become another Mogadishu.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-01-05 02:40  

#3  Legions of Atlanta personal injury lawyers to soon go hungry ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-01-05 01:51  

#2  She's got a point.
Posted by: gorb   2020-01-05 01:48  

#1  a delayed response to the incident with Jake and Elwood
Posted by: lord garth   2020-01-05 01:28  

00:00