You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Strategic Folly and The Consequences of America's Unending War in AFG
2020-01-01
[Modern War Institute at yes, West Point] If a recent article published by the Modern War Institute at West Point, "Don’t Let Kabul 2020 Look Like Saigon 1975: The Dangers of a Precipitous Afghanistan Withdrawal," represents the prevailing American views on military strategy, then it goes a long way to explain why the United States lost the Afghanistan War.

The authors did get the premise right concerning the dangers associated with a precipitous withdrawal, but by getting all the basics wrong, they offer all the wrong solutions.

The article begins with a whopper, that "a US/NATO military withdrawal must be managed responsibly to conserve the hard-earned gains on issues like civil liberties and women’s rights made over the past eighteen years."

No. Anyone who has spent any time in Afghanistan beyond the confines of a headquarters or a walled-in facility would know that is a not a valid reason to maintain a military presence in Afghanistan because it is simply not something within our capability either to establish or sustain.

A proper exit strategy is a process of burden shifting in a manner that protects vital US interests, while preventing US adversaries from unduly benefitting from a withdrawal.

Just like military leaders and policymakers over nearly two decades and through multiple administrations, the authors fail to address or even identify the true nature of the war in Afghanistan.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Women's rights in Afghanistan.

Just ponder the absurdity of that phrase. Not the objective of women's rights, not strategy for attaining same, not Afghanistan per se.

No: just try to wrap your head around the combination, in a single English sentence, of women's rights + Afghanistan.

For sheer lunacy, this combination belongs in the same category as
Miss Parson's Finishing School for Feral Youth
The Mogadishu Conservatory for Baroque Keyboard Studies
Meth-Heads Can Code!


We are ruled by morons

Posted by: Lex   2020-01-01 19:53  

#3   The hypothesis is disproved.

*happy sigh* I love when you think aloud, Dave. Your logic is remorseless, even when I dislike your conclusion.
Posted by: trailing wife   2020-01-01 19:00  

#2  
The article begins with a whopper, that "a US/NATO military withdrawal must be managed responsibly to conserve the hard-earned gains on issues like civil liberties and women’s rights made over the past eighteen years."

"Hard-earned gains"? WHAT hard-earned gains??? As far as I can tell, we've accomplished precisely nothing in the 18+ years we've been there. Same with Iraq, other than getting rid of Saddam.

These wars tested the hypothesis that Islam can be de-toxified by injecting it with democracy.

The hypothesis is disproved.
Posted by: Dave D.   2020-01-01 10:38  

#1  gains on issues like civil liberties and women’s rights

The what on what?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-01-01 09:40  

00:00