| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Report Hyped by Climate Alarmists Warned of Million of Deaths, Nuclear War, Sunken Major Cities by 2020 |
| 2019-12-29 |
| h/t Gates of Vienna [Infowars] - According to experts, climate change will result in "millions" of deaths, major European cities being sunken, nuclear war and global environmental riots...all within the next 5 days. That’s because they made the prediction back in 2004 and said all that would happen by 2020, which is just 5 days away. "Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters," reported left-wing newspaper the Guardian on February 22, 2004. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #9 Now we get and Aryan looking autistic puppet girl to rinse and repeat with a different deadline |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2019-12-29 14:00 |
| #8 Maybe not five days. Maybe they meant "the end of 2020." So they have a year and five days. Or do we believe AOC, and we now have 11 years. I wish somebody could get this straight, the science being settled and all that. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2019-12-29 11:19 |
| #7 A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world. The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents. 'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.' The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate change even exists. Experts said that they will also make unsettling reading for a President who has insisted national defence is a priority. The report was commissioned by influential Pentagon defence adviser Andrew Marshall, who has held considerable sway on US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the man behind a sweeping recent review aimed at transforming the American military under Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Climate change 'should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern', say the authors, Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network. |
| Posted by: KBK 2019-12-29 10:49 |
| #6 Last week the Bush administration came under heavy fire from a large body of respected scientists who claimed that it cherry-picked science to suit its policy agenda and suppressed studies that it did not like. Jeremy Symons, a former whistleblower at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said that suppression of the report for four months was a further example of the White House trying to bury the threat of climate change. Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it will convince the United States to sign up to global treaties to reduce the rate of climatic change. The Pentagon and Deep State versus GWB. The Observer via the Guardian |
| Posted by: KBK 2019-12-29 10:42 |
| #5 I was looking forward to buying some new seafront property too! |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2019-12-29 09:42 |
| #4 These predictions always use weasel words. |
| Posted by: Uleck Spererong9442 2019-12-29 07:35 |
| #3 In ancient times, false prophets were stoned to death. Maybe its time to return to fundamentals. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-12-29 06:32 |
| #2 I can't remember the location because you can't argue with malicious and stupid, but I traced sites back to how much flooding there would be if all the glaciers and ice caps melted. It went from 25 meters to 2.5 meters to 25 millimeters with caveats that you couldn't melt enough ice at the same time to get that depth. Liars , Liars, Farts on Fires. |
| Posted by: Gomez Flugum6633 2019-12-29 04:33 |
| #1 That reeks of Monbiot, the original Climate Shitshow-Clown at the Guardian |
| Posted by: Lex 2019-12-29 04:25 |