You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
AP reports Beltway bureaucrats ‘quitting rather than moving to the U.S. west'
2019-12-15
[Twitchy]
Opponents of the Trump administration’s plan to break up the Washington, D.C., headquarters of the country’s public lands bureau are warning of a brain drain, saying many staffers who are being reassigned are opting to quit rather than move out West.

U.S. Interior Secretary David Bernhardt defended the move Friday. Opponents have projected that the number of Bureau of Land Management staffers agreeing to move from headquarters could be as low as 15%, which Bernhardt said was “not consistent with what I’ve seen.”

The deadline for most staffers to notify the land bureau, which is overseen by the Interior Department, whether they intended to move was Thursday. But the bureau had not yet compiled a count for how many staffers had so far agreed to relocate, spokesman Derrick Henry said.

Bernhardt has called for about 300 positions to be switched from Washington to other offices in 11 Western states, including Nevada, Arizona and Utah. About 25 will be going to the new headquarters in Grand Junction, Colorado.

Former bureau employee George Stone, director of the Public Lands Foundation, said the rationale that the move will give Western residents, county commissioners and elected officials better access to federal decision-makers doesn’t make sense because most of the agency’s 10,000 employees are already in field offices outside Washington.
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#17  Not significant in terms of the total budget for government staffing but it might b nice to get them off of the future pension gravy train and maybe a building or two can be emptied out and sold/rented out.

Won't solve it but all movement in the right direction.
Posted by: ruprecht   2019-12-15 21:07  

#16  ?Move or Quit. I like it
Posted by: Frank G   2019-12-15 19:51  

#15  Lets hope they all stay in DC and don't retire outside the beltway.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2019-12-15 18:50  

#14  That's a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: Mercutio   2019-12-15 18:08  

#13  The Marianas Trench needs more bureaucrats.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2019-12-15 16:08  

#12  The North Slope of Alaska needs more bureaucrats.
Posted by: Snusotle the Lesser4227   2019-12-15 14:36  

#11  ^Best restaurants in DC. A reliable call girl service. Contacts in Washington PD & FBI. Staff like this?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-12-15 14:18  

#10  While there is no doubt a great deal of institutional knowledge in their heads

True, although there's the question of whether it is substantive knowledge, or just about knowing who processes the Form 3000-003a vs. who knows how to fill out Form 5450-003.
Posted by: charger   2019-12-15 14:14  

#9  This ones for you TW;

Such an exciting find, Dale - thank you for thinking of me!
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-12-15 13:39  

#8  ...its not like some federal 'employees' have never been subject to reduction in force. [Although I notice when it has happened, the top end of the pyramid seems not to suffer much if anything at all]
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-15 13:00  

#7  Ref #5: clearing them out..... will allow for promotions from the ranks.

If it's all the same to everyone here, I'll just refer to it is anadministrative flush.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-12-15 12:42  

#6  This ones for you TW; https://www.reddit.com/r/CulturalLayer/comments/easstb/12000_year_old_site_discovered_in_connecticut/
Posted by: Dale   2019-12-15 12:33  

#5  ...most of the agency’s 10,000 employees are already in field offices outside Washington.

It sounds like the proposed transfers are upper management types. While there is no doubt a great deal of institutional knowledge in their heads, clearing them out will allow for promotions from the ranks. If 85% of 300 senior managers quit, and guessing they are paid $200,000/year each on average, that would be a savings of $51 million per year in salaries — plus about the same again in benefits.

Not significant in terms of the total budget for government staffing, but senior staffers have been quitting without replacement since President Trump took the oath of office — remember the horror of all those desks in the State Department sitting empty, week after week?
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-12-15 12:13  

#4  I believe this is what Trump intended too happen. Another win
Posted by: chris   2019-12-15 12:03  

#3  They will stay in their perceived comfort zone, under siege. Starbucks to lament the turn of events.
Posted by: Dale   2019-12-15 11:06  

#2  Good, let'em stay on the coast.
Posted by: Skidmark   2019-12-15 10:55  

#1  Move more divisions of government. Let them quit! They will have to get real jobs or move out of D.C.
Up until Trump, DC has been a company town with only one employer so if gov group A let you go gov group B would hire you. This is now BROKEN!
Posted by: 3dc   2019-12-15 10:34  

00:00