| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| Iran, Russia, China to hold joint naval drills |
| 2019-12-03 |
[Twitter]
|
| Posted by:3dc |
| #13 Ima looking forward to the Chinese fire drills. To your room Raj. To your room. |
| Posted by: Ghost of Pappy 2019-12-03 17:51 |
| #12 Ima looking forward to the Chinese fire drills. You should be looking out for Ghost of Pappy! |
| Posted by: SteveS 2019-12-03 17:50 |
| #11 It's nice to see countries conducting sea rescue drills. Now, if the Russians can avoid releasing any radiation... |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2019-12-03 17:08 |
| #10 For some reason I'm reminded of "MLF we'll scare Breznev" |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-12-03 14:47 |
| #9 Ima looking forward to the Chinese fire drills. |
| Posted by: Raj 2019-12-03 14:37 |
| #8 Yeah, Photoshopping vessels into water is tough what with all the dynamic texturing required. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2019-12-03 14:13 |
| #7 These nations do not have the degree of joint tactical communications necessary to anything meaningful. At best they could just have the ships steam around a bit and have aircraft pass by. Even that might not happen. |
| Posted by: lord garth 2019-12-03 13:12 |
| #6 How many tow tugs will be used to pull Russian ships back to port? |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2019-12-03 12:19 |
| #5 How to build an over:under pool? - how many inter-fleet collisions - how many intra-fleet collisions - how many collisions with observer vessels - how many non-fleet rescues - how many inter-fleet rescues - how many intra-fleet rescues - how many ships depart but don't make it back to port - how many rescue vessels don't make it back to port - how many observer vessels don't make it back to port Looks like a 3 head trifecta |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2019-12-03 11:58 |
| #4 They also must learn to develop as benign an accent as possible, so that they are “intelligible to the aeronautical community.” ...hmmm...those who don't pass end up in Indian call centers? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-12-03 10:59 |
| #3 If we here at the Burg might make a suggestion: In 2001, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) determined that English would, from then on, be the standardized language of air travel, and issued a directive that stated that all aviation personnel—pilots, flight crews, and air traffic controllers—must pass an English proficiency test. The mandatory compliance date was March 5, 2008. Not only must applicants know the appropriate aviation terminology in English, they must also be able to understand English instructions via radio, with no facial cues to prompt them. They also must learn to develop as benign an accent as possible, so that they are “intelligible to the aeronautical community.” Link |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2019-12-03 08:18 |
| #2 The communications alone should be a train wreck |
| Posted by: Frank G 2019-12-03 08:14 |
| #1 ELINT from that should be interesting. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2019-12-03 07:20 |