Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
The West Was Never Really an Enemy of Soviet Communism |
2019-11-18 |
Vladimir Konstantinovich Bukovsky seemed destined to be a dissenter. The son of true-believer communists, Bukovsky realized at age ten, when Stalin died, that a mortal god was no god at all. He began to distrust the propaganda of the Soviet state. Apparently preternaturally incapable of lying, to others or, most important, to himself, Bukovsky refused to acquiesce in the quiet suicide of the conscience that is the necessary condition for any totalitarian government to succeed. As an undergraduate, Bukovsky began taking part in public demonstrations against the Soviet regime, after which he was marked for life as an enemy of the state. Bukovsky embraced this role. Like a handful of others ‐ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, of course, and poets Anna Akhmatova and Osip Mandelstein, to name just a few ‐ Bukovsky valued integrity above all else. He knew that communism was a lie and that everyone complicit with it was a liar, and he would not be a part of any of it. Tortured, imprisoned, subjected to psychological torment and physical deprivation, Bukovsky didn’t yield. He went on hunger strikes, published samizdat that circulated widely inside and outside of the Soviet Union, and made it the purpose of his life to tell everyone, everywhere: man must be free, and freedom and truth are ultimately the same thing. Bukovsky detailed the decades of abuses and outrages in a book he published after the Soviet Union, grown tired of imprisoning him and increasingly wary of dissidents in general, exiled him. To Build a Castle, which Bukovsky put out in 1978 after he had settled in England, tells the story of the depravity of communist rule. In particular, and especially under Yuri Andropov (a man whom Bukovsky hated like no other), the Soviets learned how to weaponize psychiatry in order to diagnose those who resisted socialism as suffering from "sluggish schizophrenia" or some other nonsensical malady. Declared insane (as were thousands of other dissidents), Bukovsky relied on what he called "the implacable force of one man’s refusal to submit." He was a tiny leaven of truth against the abuse of psychiatry, but even that small truth won out. The Soviets were eventually censured by their psychiatry colleagues in the West; Bukovsky had again not given in to evil, but had proceeded ever more boldly against it. In time, the Iron Curtain fell, and the Evil Empire, which had had a stranglehold on Eastern Europe and half of Eurasia, collapsed. Bukovsky had stared down the Soviet Union ‐ the individual had defeated the collective. It is at this point in the story of the Soviet Union that we in the West tend to swell with pride. We defeated the communist beast, we believe. Freedom prevailed. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#6 Declared insane (as were thousands of other dissidents), Bukovsky relied on what he called "the implacable force of one man’s refusal to submit." He was a tiny leaven of truth against the abuse of psychiatry, but even that small truth won out. Sounds familiar. We're going through our own (Deep) State-sanctioned perversion of psychiatry in this country as well. So many absurd notions are being forced upon us, daily, by the collective madness that is identity politucs wokeness and its machinery of repression in the form of denunciations, career or professional death, Twitter mobs, corporate HR Gestapo and their idiotic speech codes, "unconscious bias training," "diversity & inclusion" re-education camps and Thoughtcrime suppression. Bukovsky is us. |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-18 21:30 |
#5 Two forces fighting each other eventually look the same. Think about it. There was an interesting SciFi story done this way. Two species battling across the universe. At one point the Earth side makes humans and a planet with a similar planetary ecology to the enemy. The enemy knows their biology and ecology so knows how to bio/chem/radiation attack it. Earth fights strongly from the planet and looks at each attack modifying it to be more effective and returns the favor to the enemies colonies. At some point it gets good enough to do it to the enemies home planets and exterminate them. Then it needs to write off it's modified enemy like planets and people so they are not a future threat. The point? For 70 years each was doing the same. The Soviets even had US cities and one assumes we did the same or had think tanks doing the same (or universities). After the win over communism we didn't shut these down... |
Posted by: 3dc 2019-11-18 11:15 |
#4 redefining history to show it was from within that this happened. There are dissenters in every nation, the USSR spent their treasure in finances fighting the cold war, and their human treasure in Afghanistan. They were broken and coming apart by the time Bukovsky came around to try and steal credit. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2019-11-18 10:28 |
#3 Last statement (#2) refers to "The West Was Never Really an Enemy of Soviet Communism." |
Posted by: JohnQC 2019-11-18 08:04 |
#2 Not exactly true. More likely, our government became infested with communists during certain political eras more than others. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2019-11-18 08:02 |
#1 ‐ only to watch pieces of it rise again, he claims, and all with the conniving of the West. Cause the f****** ruling caste refused to hold those in the West accountable for their long betrayal of Western Civilization with the fall of the Wall. They wanted a more 'kinder gentler' world. You don't use aspirin to cure cancer. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-11-18 07:30 |