You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Indian Minister Slams Western Coverage of Situation in Kashmir Over Alleged Bias
2019-11-16
[SPUTNIKNEWS] Speaking about the Indian government's move to revoke Jammu and Kashmir
...a disputed territory lying between India and Pakistain. After partition, the Paks grabbed half of it and call it Azad (Free) Kashmir. The remainder they refer to as "Indian Occupied Kashmir". They have fought four wars with India over it, the score currently 4-0 in New Delhi's favor. After 72 years of this nonsense, India cut the Gordian knot in 2019, removing the area's special status, breaking off Ladakh as a separate state, and allowing people from other areas to settle (or in the case of the Pandits, to resettle) there....
's special autonomous status through an act of parliament, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has reiterated again that Kashmir is a "matter of ideological debate and liberal fundamentalism".

Participating in an interaction after delivering the fourth Ramnath Goenka Memorial Lecture on Thursday evening in India’s capital city of New Delhi, Jaishankar said foreign media criticism of the government's recent decisions on Kashmir were uninformed and devoid of merit.

Unambiguously identifying "the English-speaking liberal media (in the West) commentary on Kashmir as one of New Delhi’s biggest challenges", the Indian foreign minister said: "My reputation is not decided by a newspaper in New York".

For the most part, foreign media outlets have failed to present a fair picture of recent developments in Jammu and Kashmir, and as a result, the Indian government has faced some difficulty explaining its decision to repeal sections of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution with regard to Jammu and Kashmir to diplomats and foreign countries, Jaishankar admitted.

"As we move decisively to combat separatism in Jammu and Kashmir, there is some talk of its internationalisation and hyphenation of our ties with Pakistain. This is thinking from the past, reflecting neither the strength of India, the mood of the nation nor the determination of the government", Jaishankar said during his lecture.

He argued Western media, by and large, has strong pre-set views on Kashmir but did not cite specific examples of unfair coverage.

The international media have reported instances of alleged human rights
...which are usually entirely different from personal liberty...
violations in Indian-administered Kashmir after New Delhi revoked the special status of the region on 5 August.

Posted by:Fred

#5  Yupp, I decided to call it that until you've flipped most of it to red.☺ I pronounce it as in 'Roar', if you'll pardon the french.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-11-16 10:40  

#4  HoR = House of Representatives, right? I’m accustomed to just the House and the Senate.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-11-16 10:30  

#3  Not just the media. The American HoR seems intent on an international projection all its own. They've bypassed the Prez anyway, with Pelosi and lowly congressmen representing American deepState interests to other countries frequently.

They may not be the world's police, but the HoR does think it represents America better than Trump. Usually, the Prez's word is enough for a country's stand on a foreign issue. And the democrat party would be fine with the Kashmir thing any other time. Only if Trump did not favour the Indian stance. And western media is just the Left's mouthpiece really.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-11-16 10:14  

#2  Welcome to the party.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-11-16 07:39  

#1  Why does this sounds so familiar?

Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-16 02:41  

00:00