| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Politix | |
| The Transcript Reaction that Ann C. Wants to See | |
| 2019-09-26 | |
| [Townhall] The transcript of President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky is yet another illustration of the rule: Never ask a question you don’t know the answer to. But on the basis of one drama queen’s overreaction to a rumor she’d heard about what was said on a phone call she didn’t hear (I'm assuming the whistleblower is Christine Blasey Ford), the Democrats have launched impeachment proceedings against the president. I guess they figured it's easier than flying to South Dakota with picks and chisels and carving Trump into Mount Rushmore. But it will have the same effect. Now that the transcript has been released, it’s The New York Times that doesn't want anyone to see it. The transcript I'd like to see is the one of Nancy Pelosi reading the Trump transcript.
| |
| Posted by:Lex |
| #2 But wait — there’s more! The second issue the media does not want anyone to think about is CrowdStrike. What is CrowdStrike, you ask? That is the cybersecurity firm that is the sole source of the claim that the Russians hacked the DNC’s emails -- which launched the conspiracy theories that tied our country in knots for the past three years. The Russian collusion story was originally hatched by Hillary Clinton in the summer of 2016 to cover up the utter corruption revealed by the dump of Democratic National Committee emails on Wikileaks. As was her practice whenever a scandal threatened to engulf her, Hillary rushed out and told the press to investigate something else. ...The subsequent three years of breathless Russia coverage was based entirely on the word of one cybersecurity firm, CrowdStrike, that the DNC's emails had been hacked by Russia. Go read the whole thing. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2019-09-26 08:46 |
| #1 Well, she's a much nicer person than I'm - cause I'd like to see - never mind. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-09-26 06:23 |