You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
A10: The Customer Is Definitely Right
2019-09-03
[Strategy Page] The air force leadership, during the decades they were dedicated to retiring the A-10, did not like to discuss the usefulness of A-10s in CSAR missions. Yet this was a very popular use of the A-10 because when a pilot had to eject and was on the ground, they quickly learned that if you had the enemy nearby looking for you, what you wanted to see first was not a rescue helicopter, but a heavily armed and armored low-flying "hog" that would make sure the rescue chopper and the downed pilots were not hurt. The A-10s regularly came in low and slow seeking out enemy troops and was, unlike most aircraft, designed and armored to deal with a lot of enemy fire and keep fighting.

This CSAR chore was nothing new for the A-10 and goes back to before the A-10 entered service. Many reserve and National Guard A-10 squadrons regularly practiced CSAR tactics in part because many of the pilots were older and more experienced and retained memories of Vietnam, and the aircraft that inspired the A-10 by showing how such a low and slow aircraft could be invaluable during so many CSAR missions. The Vietnam era A-1 Skyraider (nicknamed "Spad", after a famous World War I fighter) was one of the inspirations for the A-10. The A-1 was the most popular ground support aircraft during the 1960s and proved a literal lifesaver during hundreds of Vietnam CSAR missions. Developed at the end of World War II, the A-1 was an 11 ton, single-seat, propeller-driven aircraft that carried 3.5 tons of bombs and four 20mm autocannon. The four 20mm cannon could, altogether, fire 40 rounds a second. Cruising speed was 320 kilometers an hour (versus 560 for the A-10), and the average sortie was about four hours (a little longer than the A-10). The A-10 could go as slow as 220 kilometers an hour, which was nearly as slow as the A-1 could manage but the A-10 had a max speed of 700 kilometers an hour, more than a third faster than the A-1.

The current generation of generals has more and more pilots who know very well what the A-10 can do and how much better the A-10 does it than another other aircraft. The survey of JTAC and JFO personnel confirmed it and the new generation of air force generals understood that and agreed that the A-10 was worth keeping "indefinitely."
Much more, RTWT
Posted by:KBK

#6  Was that GAU-8 bastard ever mounted on any other thing ? What a beauty.

I remember seeing photos of yards of chewed up asphalt and tarmac, with ambiguous heaps of metal scrap which used to be ISIS vehicles splattered with human gristle.

I read somewhere that the Warthog's track record of surviving war zones can only be matched by its survival of Capitol Hill for so long. Why can't there be a Thunderbolt III ? With stealth, miniaturized AWACS and lighter armour ? Materials science has surely progressed since its latest iterations were made.

On second thought, scratch that.
A-10 vs F-35 face off
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-09-03 14:00  

#5  Sometimes you need a ... Specialist... if you want the job done right.
Posted by: magpie   2019-09-03 12:09  

#4  A big gun on your nose makes a good first impression.
Posted by: jpal   2019-09-03 10:46  

#3  My beloved Warthog!
Posted by: Warthog   2019-09-03 10:44  

#2  Someone pointed out that if the Marines have their own fixed wing air support why can't the Army? (Insert all the bureaucratic self serving and self rationalizing malarkey here)
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-09-03 09:59  

#1  Hm, that should be non-WOT!
Posted by: KBK   2019-09-03 09:55  

00:00