You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Christopher Steele admitted using posts by 'random individuals' on CNN website to back up Trump dossier
2019-03-17
[Washington Examiner] Former British spy Christopher Steele admitted that he relied on an unverified report on a CNN website for part of the "Trump dossier," which was used as a basis for the FBI's investigation into Trump.

According to deposition transcripts released this week, Steele said last year he used a 2009 report he found on CNN's iReport website and said he wasn't aware that submissions to that site are posted by members of the public and are not checked for accuracy.

A web archive from July 29, 2009 shows that CNN described the site in this manner: "iReport.com is a user-generated site. That means the stories submitted by users are not edited, fact-checked, or screened before they post."

In the dossier, Steele, a Cambridge-educated former MI6 officer, wrote about extensive allegations against Donald Trump, associates of his campaign, various Russians and other foreign nationals, and a variety of companies ‐ including one called Webzilla. Those allegations would become part of an FBI investigation and would be used to apply for warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

During his deposition, Steele was pressed on the methods he used to verify allegations made about Webzilla, which was thought to be used by Russia to hack into Democratic emails.

When asked if he discovered "anything of relevance concerning Webzilla" during the verification process, Steele replied: "We did. It was an article I have got here which was posted on July 28, 2009, on something called CNN iReport."
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  "Someone said it. It must be true..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-17 13:54  

#5  Cambridge-educated former MI6 officer and successful British intelligence community entrepreneur...."wasn't aware that submissions to that site are posted by members of the public and are not checked for accuracy."

Steele knows better, of course. His audience, however . . . .
Posted by: gorb   2019-03-17 12:37  

#4  That the American taxpayer funded this is a total travesty. Posted by Bright Pebbles

No worries, it was probably funded by an agency with a secret budget... so we'll likely never feel the pain.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-03-17 12:17  

#3  Christopher Steele has sex with transvestite unicorns and is thus a security risk!

If we were to use the same "standard" for the quality checking of allegations then they could add my "accusation" to a dossier and start surveillance of all his comms.

Although my accusation has a greater degree of checkability as this site is not as anonymous as where he got the shitposts/sorry made up crap he put in the dossier.

That the American taxpayer funded this is a total travesty.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-03-17 11:12  

#2  I would argue that a report posted by a CNN ‘journalist’ and ‘fact checked’ should not be admissible in a court of law.
Posted by: Airandee   2019-03-17 05:12  

#1  Ok, so let me get this straight:

Cambridge-educated former MI6 officer and successful British intelligence community entrepreneur...."wasn't aware that submissions to that site are posted by members of the public and are not checked for accuracy."

How about.... that's where I was told the required anonymous input would be posted and on what day.

I believe what Christopher may be referring to is a cut-out.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-03-17 01:43  

00:00