Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Dems Flipped House with Out-of-State Money |
2018-12-30 |
[USA Today] The Democrats who captured the House by flipping 43 districts from red to blue received on average just over half of their large-dollar campaign funds from outside their states, another example of the nationalization of the November election that was a rebuke to President Donald Trump. The nationalization of the election was the rebuke? I guess I ain't woke enough to comprehend. The defeated Republicans in those districts, by contrast, collected only about one-third of their itemized funds from outside their states, according to a USA TODAY analysis of funding data collected by the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics. That doesn’t include all small-dollar donations which don’t have to be identified by donor, but which were also maximized by Democrats this year. One fundraising vehicle, for example, allowed Missouri freelance writer Robin Burks to give $4.68 a month ‐ or 1 cent to each of the 435 House races and 33 Senate races contested in November. Fascinating. But illogical, Captain. Top large-dollar contributors to the winning Democrats included not just regular Democratic mega donors like Florida financier S. Donald Sussman and billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer. "We were all in on flipping the House," said Steyer, who also spent millions of dollars mobilizing voters. "That was our No. 1 bottom line. First we flip the House, then we impeach the Orange Man. But they also included Seth Klarman, the head of a Boston-based private investment firm who used to give to primarily Republican causes. Seth has a personal fortune estimated at US$1.50 billion. In 2015, Klarman was listed as the 15th highest earning hedge fund manager in the world. And top donors included people like Barbara Karplus, a semi-retired teacher from California with little history of political giving, who cut back on her classroom hours to focus on researching which candidates to support. Among those she backed were 30 of the Democrats in the districts that flipped. She gave them more than $100,000 combined. Wow. My sister should've taught in her district! Barbara hasn't made it to Wikipedia, however. ![]() Then there was the Senate, where the Dim blew $70 million to try to unseat Ted Cruz in Texas. |
Posted by:Bobby |
#4 Politics is money. People with money want things from politicians. Their money will get to the politicians. Efforts should focus on revealing what money politicians are getting from whom, not trying to prevent money from flowing to politicians. |
Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2018-12-30 14:35 |
#3 Money is bad in politics. It corrupts the process. However, this only applies to Trunks, Greens, Independents running against the Inner Party. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-12-30 10:08 |
#2 I really think the only way to straighten this out is to limit all campaigns at all levels to $10. Total. Popcorn. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-12-30 08:19 |
#1 It's a game to them. Notice how they want you to be constrained in how and where you can spend money? All part of their game. You are playing whether you want to or not... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-12-30 07:45 |