You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
What the Dutch Can Teach Us About Wildfires
2018-11-17
BLUF:
[NYT] California is already one of the most expensive states in the country because of a housing shortage, and restricting growth in fire-prone areas ‐ which includes most of the state ‐ will only exacerbate that shortage, raise prices and further marginalize the most vulnerable populations. Many residents of Paradise, the town at the center of the Camp Fire, lived there specifically because they had been priced out of nearby cities.

Instead, we should take a cue from the Dutch. Much of the Netherlands sits below sea level and is therefore prone to flooding, but the Dutch can’t exactly move en masse next door to Germany. So they have learned over the centuries that the solution is to stop fighting the sea, and build their cities and towns to maximize saving lives through smarter planning and infrastructure. We could do the same with wildfire.
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  That California needs more dykes?

I see what you did there - sly stuff!
Posted by: Raj   2018-11-17 21:24  

#11  "A Capitol notion, to whelp,
For Nature herself needs our help!"
And the poor and the rich:
"Run, pups, scratch their itch!"
More pressure. A whistle. A yelp.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2018-11-17 18:32  

#10  The Dutch don't fight the ocean?

Ummm yeah, WTF? I guess they grow no tulips either.
Posted by: European Conservative   2018-11-17 14:09  

#9  That California needs more dykes?

I hope Miss Koldon is better at fire science than writing; or are we an associate professor because we spew the global warming crap.

The Dutch don't fight the ocean? done right there.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2018-11-17 14:05  

#8  California should be burying the power lines through these heavily wooded areas (everywhere actually but...) as they do in the wealthy areas. Should have done this sort of thing back in the 90s when the state was overflowing with cash.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-11-17 13:42  

#7  New York Times telling California we don't have enough housing? They want the whole state to look like the Bronx? They can go to hell.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2018-11-17 12:55  

#6  My dog interprets that 'whistle' as "more government planning and control".
Talk about a dog whistle. The above statement is a dog whistle of a dog whistle.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2018-11-17 12:34  

#5  My dog interprets that 'whistle' as "more government planning and control".

Obama sits with his head in his hands. Another missed gummit land expansion opportunity.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-11-17 11:04  

#4  A few years ago when there were fires rampant around the Tahoe and Plumas County area, a guy who worked for the U.S. Forest Service said basically the same thing as Trump has recently said, i.e. the fires are a forest management problem. The problem has gone on because of the environmentalists railing against forest management (controlled burns, etc.).
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-11-17 10:14  

#3  smarter planning and infrastructure

My dog interprets that 'whistle' as "more government planning and control".
Posted by: Bobby   2018-11-17 09:32  

#2  Logging out of dead and diseased trees is effective but opposed by 'huggers. Controlled burns as well
Posted by: Frank G   2018-11-17 09:32  

#1  Common sense alert.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-11-17 08:14  

00:00