You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
CIA says Saudi crown prince ordered Khashoggi's murder
2018-11-17
[Aljazeera] The CIA has concluded that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul, US media reported on Friday, a finding that contradicts Saudi government assertions that he was not involved.

According to the Washington Post, who first reported the CIA conclusion, US officials expressed high confidence in the CIA assessment, which is the most definitive to date linking bin Salman to the killing and complicates President Donald Trump's efforts to preserve ties with one of the closest US allies in the region.

Both the Washington Post and the Associated Press cited unnamed officials familiar with the CIA conclusion.

The accuracy of the reports could not be immediately verified.

The White House declined to comment on the Post report, saying it was an intelligence matter. The State Department and the CIA also declined to comment.

Khashoggi, a contributing columnist for the Washington Post, was killed at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2 when he went there to pick up documents he needed for his planned marriage.

A critic of the Saudi government, Khashoggi had resisted pressure from Riyadh for him to return home.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  "So what's the big deal" He says in perfect English.
"I do not know" I reply.
Posted by: newc   2018-11-17 21:18  

#8  So... the legal government of a sovereign nation ordered the assassination of a mouthpiece/organizer for the world's oldest and most fecund terrorist organization.

Not seeing any problem beyond it was executed a bit clumsily.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2018-11-17 17:28  

#7  So the NYT also says so, my confidence meter is pegged left. Bottom line is why? Why would bin Salman have ordered it (if he did?) Why would CIA say so? The latter is easy - to discredit Trump Admin's ability to support bin Salman. But why would they do that (besides Deep State hatred of all things Trump?) Is there something worse about bin Salman than I know of? - he seems no worse than those before or the alternatives (and better than most.
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-11-17 13:05  

#6  More on the topic at the New York Times.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-11-17 08:07  

#5  The relationship between the CIA and the media is so convoluted it makes a Klein Bottle seem straight forward.
Posted by: AlanC   2018-11-17 08:01  

#4  Both the Washington Post and the Associated Press cited unnamed officials familiar with the CIA conclusion.

Sources? This is the part that always bothers me. If I saw something written or broadcast from Director Haspel, I'd sign on to it.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-11-17 07:32  

#3  News garbage as usual from the main purveyors of garbage pollution.
"The accuracy of the reports could not be immediately verified."
Posted by: Dale   2018-11-17 05:52  

#2  The Babylon Bee could make a great article about how the CIA is "predicting that the USSR will finish conquering the world any day now!" Still, what would be more authoritative than Al-Jazeera citing an anonymous CIA staffer...?
Posted by: magpie   2018-11-17 02:46  

#1  Well, if the CIA says bin Salman ordered it, that settles it - bin Salman wasn't involved.
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-11-17 01:34  

00:00