You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Potential Supreme Court nominee profile: Amy Coney Barrett
2018-10-09
A potential pick for the next appointment of Associate Supreme Court Justice, Amy Coney Barrett. The Dems will go apoplectic will this nomination. Ginsburg is 85 now and can barely complete a full sentence without pausing.
[SCOTUSblog] In November 2017, President Donald Trump released a revised list of potential Supreme Court nominees. The November 2017 list was an expanded version of two earlier lists, announced during the 2016 presidential campaign, from which then-candidate Trump pledged, if elected, to pick a successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who died on February 13, 2016. First on the new list ‐ because it was in alphabetical order ‐ was Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor (and former Scalia clerk) who had recently been confirmed to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Barrett’s confirmation hearings had received considerable attention after Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee ‐ most notably, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California ‐ grilled her on the role of her Catholic faith in judging. Feinstein’s criticism did not stop Barrett from being confirmed, and since then there has been speculation that it may have in fact strengthened her case to fill the seat that will be vacated by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.

The 46-year-old Barrett grew up in Metairie, Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans, and attended St. Mary’s Dominican High School, a Catholic girls’ school in New Orleans. Barrett graduated magna cum laude from Rhodes College, a liberal arts college in Tennessee affiliated with the Presbyterian Church, in 1994. (Other high-profile alumni of the school include Abe Fortas, who served as a justice on the Supreme Court from 1965 to 1969 and Claudia Kennedy, the first woman to become a three-star general in the U.S. Army.) At Rhodes, she was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and was also recognized as the most outstanding English major and for having the best senior thesis.

After graduating from Rhodes, Barrett went to law school at Notre Dame on a full-tuition scholarship. She excelled there as well: She graduated summa cum laude in 1997, received awards for having the best exams in 10 of her courses and served as executive editor of the school’s law review.

Barrett then held two high-profile conservative clerkships, first with Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, from 1997-1998 then with the late Justice Antonin Scalia, from 1998-1999. After leaving her Supreme Court clerkship, she spent a year practicing law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a prestigious Washington D.C. litigation boutique that also claims former U.S. solicitor general Seth Waxman, former deputy attorney general Jamie Gorelick, and two regular contributors to this blog ‐ John Elwood and editor Edith Roberts ‐ as alums. Barrett went to Baker Botts, a Texas-based firm, after Miller Cassidy merged with the larger law firm, in 2000 and spent another year there before leaving for academia. To the chagrin of Democratic senators during her confirmation process, Barrett was only able to recall a few of the cases on which she had worked, and she indicated that she had not argued any appeals while in private practice.
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  I'd prefer Willett


I think Barrett needs more seasoning, and is somewhat of a blank slate to me.

Let's take a lesson from the O'Connor and Kennedy tenures.

And if picking Barrett is about replacing a woman with another woman, then that just means that "conservatism" is about accepting the Left's premises and criteria, and trying to be "better at leftism" than they are.

Which is pathetic.

Kavanaugh selected a group consisting entirely of females to be his SCOTUS clerks even before the hearings started.

Did it get him any brownie points form the libs?

Time to stop playing this mug's game.
Posted by: charger   2018-10-09 16:05  

#11  Wonder how Barett is on the illegal mass Federal surveillance. One of the reasons I didn't like Kavanaugh.

Video GINSBURG FORGETS 14TH AMENDMENT
Audience has to give her Constitution

Think the poor old gal is already "stuffed".
Posted by: Woodrow   2018-10-09 14:16  

#10  Indeed. The good news is that the missus, willing to lend her ear to the Ford recall, was completely put off by the McCain show.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2018-10-09 13:27  

#9  And with the canonization of Ginsburg the funeral is going to make the McCain Funeral Special look like a pretzel stand on an off day.

Yet, I believe, we will be able to bear it.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-10-09 13:02  

#8  Ginsberg funeral? Never happen. An occasional dusting and spot cleaning will be all that is necessary.

Safari Works Taxidermy Tips.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-10-09 12:12  

#7  Simple. She will immediately and single-handed lay overturn not just Roe v.Wade, but also take away wimen’s rights to any and all abortions, making wimmins second-class slaves to the White Priv.... You get the idea.
Posted by: Bobby on the road   2018-10-09 12:07  

#6  And with the canonization of Ginsburg the funeral is going to make the McCain Funeral Special look like a pretzel stand on an off day.

They will try to leverage that event hard, "Who's gonna fill her snooze shoes?"
Posted by: swksvolFF   2018-10-09 12:04  

#5  they can't pull the Clarence Thomas/Brett Kavanaugh sexual game

Oh?
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-10-09 10:52  

#4  China Wall.
Posted by: Jack Salami    2018-10-09 09:45  

#3  Lone Ranger- yes, the Jamie G (Miss Chime Wall on intell sharing)aspect is very troubling.
Posted by: Jack Salami    2018-10-09 09:44  

#2  Me wonders how the Dems will attack her. Because they can't pull the Clarence Thomas/Brett Kavanaugh sexual game, I wonder what kind of media circus this would create.

After all, we are supposed to believe all women.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2018-10-09 09:23  

#1  If she worked alongside Jamie Gorelick - mistress to disaster - for any length of time without quitting - then I have some immediate reservations about her character.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2018-10-09 01:09  

00:00