You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
Lindsey Graham on Kavangh accuser's poly: 'Who Paid For It?'
2018-09-19
[Daily Caller] Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina questioned who financed the polygraph test that Christine Blasey Ford reportedly took to corroborate her allegations of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

"If Ms. Ford really did not want to come forward, never intended to come forward, never planned to come forward, why did she pay for a polygraph in August?" Graham asked Monday on Fox News’s "Hannity." "And why did she hire a lawyer in August if she never intended to do what she’s doing?"

"And who paid for it?" Graham continued.
Who or what agency conducted the polygraph? Questions and answers? What were the questions? What were the answers ?

Posted by:Besoeker

#20  I had a poligraqh when I was in my early 20s, very shy back then. I was so nervous I failed it before they asked the first question. They said "You are So Quilty!".
Posted by: Ebbavirt Clunk4147   2018-09-19 22:10  

#19  There's a reason polygraphs aren't accepted by the courts.
Posted by: mossomo   2018-09-19 21:57  

#18  1. Debra Katz, who is currently representing Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused Brett Kavanugh of committing sexual assault 36 years ago is a major donor to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the DNC, according to public records.

2. Ralph Blasey III, Christine Ford’s brother was formerly employed at the D.C. offices of Baker & Hostetler LLP. That’s the same firm that made payments over over half a million dollars to Fusion GPS for the Crooked-Hillary-funded phony dossier.

3. Debra Katz is Vice Chair of the Project on Government Oversight, which is funded by George Soros and his leftist-extremist Open Society Foundation.
Posted by: Eohippus Dribble5682   2018-09-19 19:27  

#17  A document from the Podesta files at Wikileaks shows that Debra Katz, the attorney for Kavanaugh accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, was an early fundraiser for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The campaign memo intended for Clinton stated that as of November 2015 Katz had raised over $29,000 for Clinton.
Posted by: Eohippus Dribble5682   2018-09-19 19:21  

#16  Chuck Berry for the win.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Never_Can_Tell_(song)
Posted by: Bangkok Billy   2018-09-19 17:50  

#15  Huh. I can hear Aaron singing "If you don't know me by now..." but I'm not seeing it on YT. Oh well.
Posted by: Slimble Bonaparte3921   2018-09-19 16:33  

#14  #13 - that's a Chuck Berry song and he's singing it, not Neville
Posted by: Frank G   2018-09-19 15:54  

#13  Well, Ford's attorney is Debra Katz, a Washington D.C. lawyer and the vice chair of the board of the Project On Government Oversight (POGO). And who funds POGO? Soro's Open Society Foundation, among others. Smoke. Fire. Some assembly.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2018-09-19 15:40  

#12  
Posted by: 3dc   2018-09-19 15:23  

#11  Also, perhaps that is why DiFi delayed, trying to get Soros to write a check.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-09-19 14:20  

#10  I wonder about polygraphs, I mean who administered it, what witnesses. How easy would it be to get a friendly test administrator and toss results and pretend it never happened if the results are unsatisfactory?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-09-19 14:18  

#9  BTW: sociopaths can easily fool polygraphs; that's why they're not admissible.
Posted by: regular joe   2018-09-19 13:07  

#8  #8 I don't believe they ever met.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-09-19 11:47  

#7  I believe it may be possible that Ms. Ford may have attended a HS party (or two) at the same time that Kavanaugh did.

He may have rejected her advances for some reason.

You know how that goes.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2018-09-19 11:36  

#6  Why would Ford take a polygraph if this thing were not planned some time ago. Anticipation that people would question her veracity? The timing was done to do maximum damage. People in the street (or diners) interviews would indicate that people get what's going on, that it is all political.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-09-19 09:59  

#5  Kavangh did not pay for it or it would be the only thing on the news and Internet so why investigate?
Posted by: Thregum Greath3827   2018-09-19 09:14  

#4  Lindz worries me when he occasionally veers toward rationalism. I know it won't last and when the pendulum swings the other way there will be no physics involved.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2018-09-19 08:19  

#3  Feinstein and Attorney Katz are both aware of the jurisdictional and statute of limitations issues tying the FBI's hands and are using them as a lame excuse to wiggle Prof. Ford out from testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

This is so blatantly obvious that it's insulting to anyone with knowledge of the law and the FBI's investigative limitations. In layman's term , this case is dead except for the testimony of Kavanaugh and Ford.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-09-19 01:02  

#2  Fucked Over, Raw Deal
Posted by: Raj   2018-09-19 00:24  

#1  Ford stands for "Fraudulent Often, Recreant Daily."
Posted by: charger   2018-09-19 00:13  

00:00