You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Dem Rep Green: Trump Doesn't Need to Commit a Crime to Be Impeached ‐ 218 House Members Decide
2018-08-25
[Breitbart] Thursday on "Democracy Now," Rep. Al Green (D-TX) said President Donald Trump could be impeached without having committed a crime.

Green said, "This is a very sad time in the history of our country. This is not something that I enjoy talking about, nor is it something that I would like to do. But I think it’s becoming increasingly clear that the president will have two options: One, he can resign from office, or, two, he can face impeachment. Impeachment is something that the Framers of the Constitution provided for a time such as this and a president such as Trump. The president does not have to commit a crime to be impeached. In fact, the president is not likely to be indicted, which means he’s not likely to be found guilty of a crime while he’s sitting, which means that if this comes before the House, it won’t come before the House as a president who has been found guilty, but rather as a president who is alleged to have committed certain offenses that are onerous to the Constitution and that harm society. And what this president is doing is harming society."

He continued, "More specifically, what Mr. Cohen stated in court‐he had a lawyer. He is a lawyer. He says that he and the president of the United States conspired. He didn’t use that exact word, but that’s what it means when you say the president directed you, and you followed through. So they conspired to commit an offense. The president may never be found guilty of it, but he can be impeached for it. It’s my opinion that the Judiciary Committee is not doing its job. This whole impeachment investigation is being outsourced. The Framers of the Constitution intended for the Judiciary Committee to do this‐gather information, make decisions, move forward. If the Judiciary Committee doesn’t move forward, then I think it’s incumbent upon the 435 members, each of whom have the opportunity to bring articles of impeachment, to consider doing so. I will surely consider doing so."
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  ...it just says 'bad behavior'. Skipping the Constitution as written and making it up seems to meet my category.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-08-25 17:29  

#8  Is there similar no crime criteria for impeachment for Supreme Court judges, federal judges...
Posted by: Airandee   2018-08-25 14:51  

#7  The House impeaches, the Senate decides. The honourable representative from somewhere in Texas is talking just to hear his own voice.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-08-25 12:07  

#6  There's this one little requirement from the Constitution that Green is overlooking: "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
Posted by: warthogswife   2018-08-25 12:07  

#5  Al Green is one of the dumbest Dem reps.

Dumb in the sense of lacking discretion - not dumb in the sense of having dumber goals than the rest of them.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-08-25 10:04  

#4  Impeachment? Let's start with Al Green and move on to Waters, Pelosi, Schumer, Durbin, Tim Kaine, Booker...and all the other Dems who are so hot for impeachment.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-08-25 09:19  

#3  Al Green is one of the dumbest Dem reps. Might be the cheap pomade
Posted by: Frank G   2018-08-25 07:13  

#2  Which also implies they intend to make it a one party system, cause if the other party got control again, they'd do the same to any executive of your own party.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-08-25 06:38  

#1  We know.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-08-25 03:21  

00:00