You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
How BRICS Plus clashes with the US economic war on Iran
2018-07-29
[AsiaTimes] Rhetorical war has far-reaching consequences, including a potential economic slump via the disruption of global oil supplies.

The key take away from the BRICS summit in Johannesburg is that Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – important Global South players – strongly condemn unilateralism and protectionism.

The Johannesburg Declaration is unmistakable: “We recognize that the multilateral trading system is facing unprecedented challenges. We underscore the importance of an open world economy.”

Closer examination of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s speech unlocks some poignant details.

Xi, crucially, emphasizes delving further into “our strategic partnership.” That implies increased BRICS and Beyond BRICS multilateral trade, investment and economic and financial connectivity.

And that also implies reaching to the next level; “It is important that we continue to pursue innovation-driven development and build the BRICS Partnership on New Industrial Revolution (PartNIR) to strengthen coordination on macroeconomic policies, find more complementarities in our development strategies, and reinforce the competitiveness of the BRICS countries, emerging market economies and developing countries.”

If PartNIR sounds like the basis for an overall Global South platform, that’s because it is.

In a not too veiled allusion to the Trump administration’s unilateral pullout from the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), Xi called all parties to “abide by international law and basic norms governing international relations and to settle disputes through dialogue and differences through consultation,” adding that the BRICS are inevitably working for “a new type of international relations.”

Relations such as these certainly do not include a superpower unilaterally imposing an energy export blockade – an act of economic war – on an emerging market and key actor of the Global South.

Xi is keen to extol a “network of closer partnerships.” That’s where the concept of BRICS Plus fits in. China coined BRICS Plus last year at the Xiamen summit, it refers to closer integration between the five BRICS members and other emerging markets/developing nations.
Lots of words and text, then Iran stuff.
Iranian “nuclear weapons” was always a bogus issue. Tehran did not have them – and was not pursuing them. Yet now the highly volatile rhetorical war introduces the hair-raising possibility of Tehran perceiving there is a clear danger of a US nuclear attack or an attack whose purpose is to destroy the nation’s infrastructure. If cornered, there’s no question the IRGC would buy nuclear weapons on the black market and use them to defend the nation.

This is the “secret” hidden in Soleimani’s message.
Besides, Russia could easily – and secretly – supply Iran with state-of-the-art defensive missiles and the most advanced offensive missiles.
Posted by:3dc

#7  Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – important Global South players

Russia?! They’ll be shocked to discover that along the way the famous Russian winter became a tropical paradise.

Iranian “nuclear weapons” was always a bogus issue. Tehran did not have them – and was not pursuing them.

Vacuous nonsense or outright lies? Why would Iran need a deal with President Obama to discontinue that pursuit if there was no pursuit? All they would have to do is open the claimed facilities to inspection, showing that the claimed equipment and supplies did not exist.

Besides, Russia could easily – and secretly – supply Iran with state-of-the-art defensive missiles and the most advanced offensive missiles.

At the moment North Korea cannot continue its part of the joint nuclear weapons development program, but Pakistan and China are as viable potential suppliers as Russia. China is more likely than Russia, anyway, having supplied technology to Pakistan, at the very least. “Indigenously developed”, my Aunt Fanny.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-07-29 15:33  

#6  {Why is the already overtaxed American taxpayer subsidizing these hostile countries? }

We're not subsidizing them. We're maintaining a collar over their windpipes that can be tightened at will. China understands this. That's why they're building their own navy - so it can be used to remove this collar (i.e. US Navy ships) so their land grabs will go off without a hitch, even if Uncle Sam opposes those land grabs with more than just words.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2018-07-29 14:40  

#5  Another Communist viewpoint article by Pepe Escobar. That's "Comrade" Pepe.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2018-07-29 13:42  

#4  Another Communist viewpoint article by Pepe Escobar. Meh.
Posted by: Count Galeazzo Snusons8281   2018-07-29 12:29  

#3  Quite a Rogue's Gallery there: Brazil and India are just doing their tedious "Third World Unaligned Nation" (which actually means Kleptocracies of the 3rd World Unite!)
Circus Show while the others are just are Enemies...
Posted by: magpie   2018-07-29 10:45  

#2  Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – important Global South players

Eh?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-07-29 04:53  

#1  These nations could only prosper in an environment where the US Navy gives them free protection for exports. It's not that they're not paying their fair share, it's that they aren't paying a dime.

Why is the already overtaxed American taxpayer subsidizing these hostile countries?
Posted by: Herb McCoy   2018-07-29 00:56  

00:00