| Submit your comments on this article |
| International-UN-NGOs |
| Why the concern for UNRWA? |
| 2018-07-06 |
| [Jpost] On Monday, seven former US ambassadors to the UN sent a letter to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo insisting that the administration restore full funding to UNRWA, the UN agency that funds so-called Palestinian refugees. Since UNRWA was established in 1949, the US has given nearly $5 billion to the agency tasked with perpetuating refugee status among descendants of Arabs who left Israel in the 1948-1949 pan-Arab invasion. In January, then-secretary of state Rex Tillerson informed the UN that the US was slashing its assistance to UNRWA by 50%, from $260 million to $130 million. At the time, citing UNRWA’s support for terrorism and economic corruption, UN Ambassador Nikki Haley recommended ending US financial assistance for the agency outright. The issue of UNRWA, and the US’s involvement with the group, hasn’t received much attention in the intervening months. But now that the former ambassadors have brought it up, it is worth taking a second look at UNRWA and considering whether they are right, and what their bipartisan position tells us about the bipartisan consensus that controlled US policy toward Israel and the Palestinians until President Donald Trump took office. UNRWA and its supporters present the agency as an organization dedicated to supporting Palestinian refugees. But this is a lie. UNRWA is a political warfare organization that deliberately perpetuates the misery of innocent people. ...UNRWA’s distinctively non-humanitarian purpose is baked in. Refugees worldwide are helped by the UN’s High Commissioner for Refugees. UNHCR targets its services to real refugees ‐ people who meet the definition of the Refugee Convention of having lost their state home due to persecution. UNRWA targets its services to people of Palestinian descent it calls "refugees" for political reasons; fewer than 1% of the UNRWA refugees would actually meet the Refugee Convention definition. UNHCR finds refugees and gives them help; UNRWA finds people who need help and makes them refugees. The UNHCR is responsible for helping refugees find asylum and settle in another country. Today it cares for nearly 66 million refugees worldwide. It has one staffer for every 6,000 refugees. UNRWA, in contrast, is responsible for preventing Palestinian refugees from gaining asylum or resettling anywhere. It is responsible for 5.2 million refugees and has one staffer for every 186 refugees. Over the past 70 years, UNHCR has permanently resettled tens of millions of refugees. It found permanent homes for 189,300 refugees in 2016 alone. UNRWA has resettled no refugees in its 69-year history. It is now responsible for the fifth generation of descendants of the Arabs who left Israel in 1948-49. Every dollar the US transfers to UNRWA is a dollar used to perpetuate this misery. And it is arguably a dollar spent in breach of US law. According to the US Law on Derivative Refugee Status, spouses and children of refugees can apply for derivative status as refugees. Grandchildren are explicitly ineligible for that status. But by funding UNRWA, the US funds an agency that has required the perpetuation of refugee status of the Arab refugees from 1948-49 for five generations. ...For years, then-US senator from Illinois Mark Kirk tried to compel the State Department to reveal how many Palestinian refugees actually left Israel during the pan-Arab invasion. Due to his efforts, in 2013, the Senate Appropriations Committee unanimously approved an amendment to the annual State Department foreign operations appropriations bill requiring the State Department to report how many of the 5 .2 million Palestinians on UNRWA’s rolls were actual refugees. Rather than reveal the number, which is estimated to stand at 20,000, or 1% of the number UNRWA claims, the State Department classified the figure in 2015. It still refuses to release it. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #6 What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to drive them before you, and to read their womanly letters of lamentation. Pickering and Negroponte made their bones in the Law of the Sea struggles If memory serves, the Convention on the Law of the Sea was a global freakout over the the cover story for the Glomar Explorer attempting to raise a Russian sub. World + Dog went nutso thinking the evil Americans going to hoover up all the manganese nodules off the entire seafloor, but all we really wanted was one teensy ballistic missile sub. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2018-07-06 17:10 |
| #5 Caroline Glick is always worth reading. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2018-07-06 13:49 |
| #4 ...You know, given the current leadership in DC and our representation at the UN, this is easy: Not one more damned dime until UNRWA turns over accurate, realistic numbers. I suspect Ambassador Haley would relish delivering that message. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2018-07-06 08:09 |
| #3 Pickering and Negroponte made their bones in the Law of the Sea struggles that involved the State Department in the nineteen seventies. Active and intelligent young Foreign Service officers, over the years their vision has been clouded as they moved closer to the center of power in Washington. Now they are old and suffer from cataracts. |
| Posted by: Clurong Peacock9529 2018-07-06 07:45 |
| #2 Former UN ambassadors Thomas Pickering and Edward Perkins, who served under president George H.W. Bush; Madeline Albright and Bill Richardson, who served under president Bill Clinton; John Negroponte, who served under George W. Bush; and Samantha Power and Susan Rice who served under President Barack Obama, Who's Who of the globalist / deep-state coterie. This is my shocked face. /s |
| Posted by: AlanC 2018-07-06 07:32 |
| #1 Every dollar the US transfers to UNRWA is a dollar used to perpetuate this misery. In strict compliance with the United Nation's 'global misery' business model. Without conflict, suffering and misery, there would be no need for a United Nations. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2018-07-06 07:13 |