[Hot Air] Mark Penn is a longtime Clinton insider. He helped defend Bill Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky story broke and later went to work for Hillary Clinton as a chief strategist for her 2008 campaign for president. Today, Penn has written a piece for the Hill asking a simple question: Who is paying the bills for Stormy Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti?
From the beginning, this has been fishy. Daniels’s previous lawyer advised her to stick to her agreements. In contrast, Avenatti okayed her violating with impunity her non-disclosure agreement on "60 Minutes" despite a binding arbitration judgment against her. She acknowledged on Twitter that she is not paying for her lawyer. So who is? And did he indemnify her against all multimillion-dollar penalties?...
Avenatti has been given a free, unfettered media perch on TV to spread his stuff without the networks forcing him to meet any disclosure requirements, saying that he is Daniels’s attorney when someone else entirely is paying for this operation is not true disclosure that allows the viewer to evaluate the source and potential conflicts. He is now being given deference as though he is a journalist interested in protecting unverified sources while he makes headline-grabbing pronouncements. Lawyers need to disclose the source of their evidence...
The more you peel back the onion, the more Cohen and Avenatti seem alike. Both are fixers who bend every rule they can get away with. Fairly or unfairly, Cohen is being put under the microscope and we can rest assured that every payment in or out will be fully scrutinized by law enforcement. But Avenatti can’t be given a pass on these issues. Americans are entitled to know just who this guy is, who is writing his checks and whether he legally obtained his information.
As Jazz pointed out yesterday, Avenatti’s latest big splash, releasing financial records belonging to Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen, raises questions about where he got the information. The Washington Post reports the Treasury Department’s Inspector General is now looking into exactly that question.
|