You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Don’t Get Too Excited About the Korea Summit
2018-05-03
[AAWSAT] We should all be glad that Kim Pudge Jong-un
...the overweight, pouty-looking hereditary potentate of North Korea. Pudge appears to believe in his own divinity, but has yet to produce any loaves and fishes, so his subjects remain malnourished...
, the leader of North Korea, and Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea, had a positive summit ‐ and that Kim literally took a historic step into the South, as did Moon, briefly, into the North. Dialogue is certainly better than a march to war. That said, we all need to keep our expectations in check.

Although the leaders agreed in the Panmunjom Declaration to work together toward a permanent peace rather than the current armistice and declared a commitment to "denuclearization," we cannot know whether this statement of principles will be of lasting worth until the details are hammered out. This is certain to be a long and difficult process.

Similarly, we should all welcome the Trump-Kim summit expected in May or June. But no summit declaration on that occasion will be meaningful regarding North Korea’s nuclear arsenal if the definition of the term "denuclearization" is left blurry and no robust verification regime is put in place. We need to see concrete steps. That would include, in the first instance, allowing the ineffective International Atomic Energy Agency back into North Korea to begin an assessment of Pyongyang’s nuclear program and ensure, if possible, that North Korea is not advancing the program while talks continue.

Any US-North Korean declaration must also include a detailed definition of "denuclearization" to ensure that we are all talking about the same thing. In 1992, when the North and South issued a joint declaration, this term was born because "disarmament" was considered unacceptable terminology. Pyongyang has long used denuclearization as a proxy for ensuring that its security was guaranteed and not threatened by US military power and nuclear weapons. The United States, and the rest of the world, are looking for quite a different outcome: the destruction of North Korea’s nuclear weapons and permanent constraints on its missiles. President Trump must also concern himself with Americans held in North Korea, Pyongyang’s cybercrimes and its disastrous human rights
One man's rights are another man's existential threat.
record.

Related: Zero Hedge (but worthy of a read) - China's Long Game In Korea
Posted by:Fred

#5  Ceaușescu solution is likely if the North sees how they've been lied to and starved. I'm sure Kimmie is aware of that.

The sad thing is that when we turned on Libya soon after they got rid of their WMD we set a negative precedent that gives Kimmie few options but to hold on for dear life or seek protected exile somewhere.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-05-03 15:40  

#4  Will Dennis Rodman be appointed ambassador to NKor or has he gone back to his home planet for good?
Posted by: SteveS   2018-05-03 11:48  

#3  The key is China, not N or S Korea, or US. Trump may have made China nervous about continuing to encourage Kim's antagonism, for fear of Trump and/or Kim losing self-control.
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-05-03 10:58  

#2  Key to the process is remembering that when you are speaking and interacting with the Norks, you are actually speaking and interacting with the Chinese.

BTW, for a real taste of 'Euro Think' toward the U.S., don't miss the Klassenfeind reader comment in the ZH link. They're always wishing us the very best.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-05-03 06:29  

#1  I'm not. The only way this problem will be resolved is the Ceaușescu solution.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-05-03 05:44  

00:00