You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Britain
Dozens of elite firearms officers who guard Britain's nuclear weapons can't carry guns because they are too UNFIT
2018-04-30
[DailyMail] The crisis has emerged after the introduction of more gruelling fitness tests equal to those taken by other armed officers in the UK.

Some MoD police – who protect the nuclear submarine fleet at Faslane, GCHQ’s iconic base in Gloucestershire and Devonport’s historic naval dockyards – have failed the new tests, while others have simply refused to take part.

Last night, former Army officer Leo Docherty MP, who sits on the Defence Select Committee, said: ‘There is absolutely no reason why those serving in the MoD Police should not observe the same high standards of those in the Armed Forces.

The MoD Police protect the country’s nuclear weapons facilities, military bases and intelligence headquarters, while its armed officers have also been deployed on the streets of Britain in the aftermath of terror attacks.

But official documents reveal huge problems within the 2,500-strong force, where more than 30 officers were either sacked or allowed to quit for not patrolling top- security sites properly in a scandal revealed by the MoS last year.
That’s 1.2%, I believe.
The force is 200 officers short,
That’s 7.4% of the target 2,700.
yet faces huge budget cuts that could risk national security, while the new fitness tests have left many officers unable to perform their duties.

David Riddle, chairman of the MoD Police Committee, an independent body which oversees the force, wrote in its annual report: ‘The gap [in officers] is exacerbated by rising levels of sickness absence and officers unfit to perform the full range of duties.

‘In the short term, the problems are likely to get worse because of the number of officers who may fail the fitness standard or health check.’
No doubt.
Until last year, officers – ‘still heavily weighted towards over 50s’ according to the annual report – had to pass a shuttle run test set by the Institute of Naval Medicine and faced no sanction if they failed.

But now they have to complete the test to the more stringent standard expected of firearms officers in other police forces, and will face disciplinary procedures if they fail another three times.
So some have failed a test they were never before asked to pass, but they are given the opportunity to improve.
The annual report warns that the stricter rules ‘could initially produce more officers judged non-capable of carrying out armed duties (by reason of fitness or health)’.
Surely that was expected.
In the first year of the tests, the report said, ‘over 600 officers (around 25 per cent of the force) have not yet come forward to test themselves’.
Possibly they’ve been busy, or they are still in the queue, waiting their turn to be tested.
Another three per cent failed the test,
...that is to say, 75 failed first time. But they have two more chances to try...
while five per cent could not take it for health reasons.

Figures up to March 2017 showed that nine per cent of the workforce is currently assessed as not being capable to carry a firearm, with 60 officers on long-term sick leave, 152 deemed ‘temporarily non-capable’ due to illness, injury or lack of fitness, and another 19 suffering long-term medical conditions.
That’s a total of 231, but 9% of 2,500 is 225.
Eamon Keating, national chairman of the Defence Police Federation, said: ‘Given fitness testing was only introduced two years ago, it should not be a surprise that some officers have struggled to meet these requirements in the absence of any prior assessment.’

The ‘health and capability’ of the officers was described as among the most significant risks facing the force, said the annual report.

But it added that the ‘key issue’ facing the MoD Police was its lack of money. It faced a £15 million cut to its £130 million budget in the past year – ‘delivered at the expense of policing and security services’.

‘The spending cuts mean there is a large gap between resources currently available and the established level of customer requirements,’ the report stated.
Posted by:Skidmark

#4  They can tweet like nobody's business, though.
Posted by: charger   2018-04-30 12:10  

#3  Range qual was a bugger. Getting down in the prone firing position... no problem. Getting back up again, an entirely different story.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-04-30 08:22  

#2  If being out of shape was an actual bar to handling a firearm, 20Million OFWG's would be doing pushups.
Posted by: Mercutio   2018-04-30 08:15  

#1  while others have simply refused to take part.

WTF??? I understand that introducing a new test will probably lead to failure the first time, but, refuse to take part?

I think we may have found the problem of Merry Old England right here.
Posted by: AlanC   2018-04-30 08:05  

00:00