Submit your comments on this article |
Science & Technology |
LockMart Patents FUSION REACTOR! |
2018-03-30 |
![]() The patent, for a portion of the confinement system, or embodiment, is dated Feb. 15, 2018. The Maryland-headquartered defense contractor had filed a provisional claim on April 3, 2013 and a formal application nearly a year later. Our good friend Stephen Trimble, chief of Flightglobal's Americas Bureau, subsequently spotted it and Tweeted out its basic details. In 2014, the company also made a splash by announcing they were working on the device at all and that it was the responsibility of its Skunk Works advanced projects office in Palmdale, California. At the time, Dr. Thomas McGuire, head of the Skunk Works’ Compact Fusion Project, said the goal was to have a working reactor in five years and production worthy design within 10. Of course, it remains to be seen if Lockheed Martin’s fusion reactor will actually become a reality. Many other companies and institutions have tried for nearly a century to create workable fusion power without success. On the one hand, a corporation receiving a patent does not necessarily mean they are actively pursuing the technology that the document describes, either. In addition, since the media blitz in 2014, Skunk Works has said very little about this project outside of the plasma physics community. The U.S. government also reserves the right to classify patents it feels might be a threat to national security if they were public, so the fact that this one is not might also calls into question how mature the system might be in actuality. Still, the that Skunk Works continued to pursue the patent process over the past four years would similarly seem to indicate that they are indeed pushing ahead with the program, at least to some degree. This storied division definitely does have an impressive pedigree when it comes to advanced research and development projects, too. They were also confident enough four years ago to give interviews and offer significant details about the basic reactor design, the projected timeline, and the overall program goals, suggesting that it was a serious endeavor. Considering the five year timeline Dr. McGuire put out in 2014 for achieving a workable prototype, maybe we’re due for another big announcement from Lockheed Martin in the near future. |
Posted by:3dc |
#7 Environuts will hate it. Cheap clean energy allows people to thrive, dammit |
Posted by: Frank G 2018-03-30 14:06 |
#6 Considering the five year timeline At least the fusion community has gone from a 40 year moving window to a 5 year moving window. That's progress. |
Posted by: Gleremble Big Foot8836 2018-03-30 13:42 |
#5 Looks about the right size to operate for 1us at 5MTons. |
Posted by: Gleremble Big Foot8836 2018-03-30 13:40 |
#4 Al Gore hardest hit. |
Posted by: Iblis 2018-03-30 10:45 |
#3 I'm so looking forward to reports of famine in KSA. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-03-30 04:11 |
#2 The Patent US20180047462A1 Filed 2014 so not current prototype. |
Posted by: 3dc 2018-03-30 02:12 |
#1 Fusion? With the coming of electric cars, we can basically gut the petroleum market for anything other than lubricants and plastics, and perhaps aviation/military use. Knocks the socks right off Russian and OPEC |
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891 2018-03-30 00:40 |