You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
37 State Attorneys General Demand Answers From Zuckerberg In Data Harvesting Scandal
2018-03-28
[ZH] Thirty-seven "profoundly concerned" U.S. state and territory attorneys general fired off a letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Monday, demanding answers over reports that personal user information from Facebook profiles was provided to third parties without the users' knowledge or consent.

"Most recently, we have learned from news reports that the business practices within the social media world have evolved to give multiple software developers access to personal information of Facebook users. These reports raise serious questions regarding consumer privacy"

The letter notes the 50 million Facebook profiles which may have been "misused and misappropriated by third-party software developers," noting that Facebook "took as much as 30%" of payments made through applications used by Facebook users.

"According to these reports, Facebook’s previous policies allowed developers to access the personal data of "friends" of people who used applications on the platform, without the knowledge or express consent of those "friends." It has also been reported that while providing other developers access to personal Facebook user data, Facebook took as much as thirty (30) percent of payments made through the developers’ applications by Facebook users."

n other words - while a Facebook user may have agreed in the fine print to allowing the social media giant to hoover up their information - their "friends" did not.

Posted by:Besoeker

#6  whereas it was a "gift in kind" to OFA

Hildebeast was given the same 'consideration' in 2016.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2018-03-28 14:44  

#5  Yes, every one of those AG's has a big $$$ settlement in their eyes. I remember reading a article in a tech publication in 2013 about Obama For America HQ having a "dark room" with private access located a floor below political operations staffed with predictive analytical tech kids and ran by one of the founders of FB. DNC was pissed off because they were not "shared" access to the data after Obama didn't need it anymore...or more realistically considered a monetized asset that could be purchases or horse traded for. Team Trump had to buy access to the FB data, whereas it was a "gift in kind" to OFA.
Posted by: Capsu78   2018-03-28 11:24  

#4  I use FB, but have my privacy settings tightened up and don't use 3rd party apps
Posted by: Frank G   2018-03-28 10:07  

#3  Just requires an act of Congress, your personal information belongs to you. Only the government can request the information. It can not be released to third parties regardless of consent forms for use other than positive identification of the individual, and then only the minimal amount necessary. All such collected date can not be transferred or transmitted by any non-governmental actor.

So simple, but watch how desperately those involved would obstruct that. Cause there is money and power to be made.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-03-28 09:10  

#2  It was hibernating.
Posted by: Raj   2018-03-28 08:35  

#1  Where were this outrage in 2012?
Posted by: AlanC   2018-03-28 07:53  

00:00