| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg rules that hot dogs are sandwiches |
| 2018-03-24 |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #23 A fun thread. |
| Posted by: Blackbeard Bumble5724 2018-03-24 20:42 |
| #22 :-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2018-03-24 20:37 |
| #21 There was only one link, but I reset my cookie anyway. Got a fresh batch in the oven! :) |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2018-03-24 20:08 |
| #20 Cookie reset |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2018-03-24 20:06 |
| #19 Also, number of links multi-link spam Heh. |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2018-03-24 19:51 |
| #18 I didn't see the bit (current network "hosts" make my skin crawl), but could they have been having a little joke? "Justice Ginsburg, you're no Felix Frankfurter... well, no, wait... I guess you are! Har har har!" "Tee-hee. I suppose I am, Jimmy!" [chews fishnet finger fetchingly] Or something like that? |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2018-03-24 19:43 |
| #17 Shes a woman. Any weenie that comes with nice buns is a sandwich. |
| Posted by: Omeger Gray6606 2018-03-24 19:16 |
| #16 Long time no see |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-03-24 14:38 |
| #15 This is why we love you, #13 tw. I wanna be just like you if I ever grow up. :-D |
| Posted by: Barbara 2018-03-24 14:33 |
| #14 Perhaps Rantburg trimmed SCFI's access because he was rude. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2018-03-24 13:29 |
| #13 Gentlemen, when in doubt it always helps to go to the posted article. In this case, all of your objections are addressed in the first few lines, exactly as Seeking cure described, to whit: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has declared a ruling on a white-hot issue, announcing that hot dogs are indeed sandwiches. The octogenarian made her decision on the “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” on March 21. “I was told not to ask her about any pending cases before the court, but I just had to ask her about one of the most divisive issues facing our country,” Stephen Colbert quipped, but he evidently couldn’t resist. “Is a hot dog a sandwich?” he asked the long serving Justice Ginsburg in a one-on-one interview. “You tell me what a sandwich is and then I’ll tell you if a hot dog is a sandwich,” she tactfully replied. Normally y’all are much more insightful than this — perhaps a cup of coffee would help? About Seeking cure’s link and article posting problem: try deleting your Rantburg cookie, then type in your nym into the Your Name box in a blank comment to reset it. Also, Fred has limited the number of links that can be put in a single comment to two or three, if that is what you were trying to do; he did this because multi-link spam in the comments became a problem at one point. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2018-03-24 12:58 |
| #12 All previous haranging aside, by the same logic, that means RBG is a really a judge. |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2018-03-24 12:49 |
| #11 Something's wrong with Rantberg today, I cannot post hyperlinks nor post the article i'm referring to. Yeah, that sucks... |
| Posted by: HTML B. Hard 2018-03-24 11:11 |
| #10 #8 Something's wrong with Rantberg today, I cannot post hyperlinks nor post the article i'm referring to. Posted by Seeking cure for ignorance and we're the idiots... uh huh :-) |
| Posted by: Frank G 2018-03-24 10:58 |
| #9 Looks like Colbert got one over you! Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance 2018-03-24 10:06 Seeking, you might note that "Short Attention Span Theater" is the Rantburg section that normally covers humor and other silly stories. Just saying for future reference... |
| Posted by: magpie 2018-03-24 10:33 |
| #8 Something's wrong with Rantberg today, I cannot post hyperlinks nor post the article i'm referring to. |
| Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance 2018-03-24 10:19 |
| #7 I never thought I'll see the day you uys are making the left look good! Fox news left out a few details, they're no better than the fake news sites. I had to do a search on DuckDuckGo to find the an article that mention that Colbert was not allowed to ask Ginsburg any questions about pending SC cases. Also note this is not a official SC (or any court) ruling, but a TV show interview. Really guys, I thought your reading comprehensive skills were better than this! Looks like Colbert got one over you! |
| Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance 2018-03-24 10:06 |
| #6 She's playing word games with Colbert on TV. Late-night TV silliness. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2018-03-24 09:59 |
| #5 So if, say, RBG gets placed between two pieces of bread... Got ya covered, gorb - introducing the Idiot Sandwich! |
| Posted by: Raj 2018-03-24 09:08 |
| #4 Shouldn't have dictatorial "for life" terms in the first place. |
| Posted by: DooDahMan 2018-03-24 09:02 |
| #3 Should have mandatory retirement age from the bench. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-03-24 03:22 |
| #2 What is this court doing? Assassinating it''s own authority? How long has it been since she has had a hot dog? And why it this on the docket? |
| Posted by: newc 2018-03-24 01:58 |
| #1 So if, say, RBG gets placed between two pieces of bread and someone pokes a toothpick through the assembly to keep her from rolling out, is it still battery? |
| Posted by: gorb 2018-03-24 01:15 |