Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Internet sleuth confirms Seth Rich was the WikiLeaks informer. Offered proof to Mueller. Not interested. Does not fit the Russian collusion narrative |
2018-02-22 |
[PowderedWigSociety] Robert Mueller continues to chase his tail looking for evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, despite there being zero evidence. There is evidence, however, that the Russians did NOT hack Hitlery’s or the DNC’s email, that the hack was no hack at all, but, rather, an inside job, which is what many suspected all along, and that the hacker was DNC employee Seth Rich who was shot twice in the back and murdered in Washington but not before he could transfer the stolen emails to Julian Assange. Evidence of Rich being the hacker instead of shady Russians, as the Democrats want you to believe, is in the hands of Kiwi internet sleuth Kim Dotcom, who not only knows of Rich’s leak to Assange, but was involved in the leak himself. Here is the really strange part of the story, or not so strange if you have followed it closely, in which case you can see clearly what is going on ‐ Dotcom offered his evidence that Rich was the WikiLeaks informant to Robert Mueller.... TWICE! But, both times Mueller refused to even consider it. ![]() Why? Obviously, because it would destroy the Russian hacking narrative and end the witch hunt, which Democrats need desperately to stay alive if they are to have a prayer of gaining a congressional majority in November to ensure their dream of impeaching President Trump. This proves that Mueller is not objective, impartial, or nonpartisan. He is a political tool of the Democrat Party, searching frantically for any evidence of Donald Trump being within ten miles of any Russian during the 2016 presidential campaign. President Trump is all over this, hinting Dotcom’s involvement in a Sunday morning tweet. The "400 pound genius" President Trump alludes to is an obvious reference to Dotcom, who confirms in a follow-up tweet that the theft of the sensitive Democrat emails was NOT the work of Russians and that he has offered his evidence to Mueller who refused it, then correcting the president’s weight guess, tweeting "360 pounds!" Continues with Tweetie thingies. |
Posted by:Anomalous Sources |
#8 Don't forget the lies about the Benghazi QRF cancellations, and what is happening with the unprecedented exculpatory evidence referral by the Judge now hearing Flynn's sentencing hearing. Years ago there was a great novel by Arnaud de Bourchgrave (sp) called "the Spike". It was about the choices of what NOT to print, and who made those decisions. Maybe an actual journalist could explore that process of collusion among the editorial elites in out media. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2018-02-22 14:56 |
#7 Not much in the news about Seth Rich. Not much in the news about Clinton e-mails. Not much in the news about Platte River Networks Not much in the news about the Awan bros. Not much in the news about Huma Abadin's laptop. Not much in the news about Loretta Lynch. Not much in the news about Uranium One. Not much in the news about Christopher Steele. There's really just not much in the news. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-02-22 13:01 |
#6 Suspected here at Rantburg since the DNC rally and primary; Bernie Bro supporter or at least sympathizer. To top, the Seth Rich murder was very odd. Not Mueller's job. His job is to piss in your face and tell you to stop crying. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2018-02-22 09:50 |
#5 The Russian Collusion narrative is dying. There has been information floating around out there for over a year that it was not a Russian hack of the sociopath's email or her campaign manager or the DNC. It was clearly an inside job. If Mueller is ignoring this information, perchance Nunes can grab onto it as he works his way through this scandal. BTW, with all of this Russian Collusion stuff on CPR, what happened to all of that information about the Podesta brothers involvement with the Russians up to and during the election? Is Mueller even going there at all? |
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2018-02-22 09:44 |
#4 Samuel Johnson is right. |
Posted by: Howard Johnson 2018-02-22 09:42 |
#3 You don't want exculpatory evidence in your files when the judge orders you to turn over any such thing. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-02-22 09:09 |
#2 Well, Wikileaks sources have sort of dried up a bit over the past year or so. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-02-22 07:43 |
#1 Get the FBI on this right away ! Then get their copy to Senator McCain and get him to shop it around like McCain did the Steele "evidence". Then leak all the results to CNN and NBC and see what they do with it |
Posted by: Glavise Sforza4112 2018-02-22 05:44 |