You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Pentagon's New Deploy-or-Out Policy Could Separate Up to 286K
2018-02-18
[Mil.com] The Pentagon's new "deploy-or-out" policy could result in the separation from military service of possibly 286,000 personnel who are currently deemed medically unfit for overseas duty.

"This new policy is a 12-month deploy or be removed policy," Robert Wilkie, the undersecretary of defense for Personnel and Readiness, told the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel Wednesday.

Wilkie said there would be exceptions for pregnancies and the services would also be able to retain wounded troops who are cleared by medical boards.

"On any given day, about 13 to 14 percent of the force is medically unable to deploy -- that comes out to be around 286,000 service members," Wilkie said.

The new policy grew out of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis' directive last summer to the services to take steps to improve the "lethality" of the force in overseas operations. Mattis' guidance said the services' actions should be "designed to ensure our military is ready to fight today and in the future."

The solution the services came up with required service members to be deployable within 12 months or be forced out of the military.

In justifying the major policy initiative, Wilkie said that "The situation we face today is really unlike anything we have faced -- certainly in the post-World War II era. We have to ensure, given the climate this country faces, that everyone who signs up can be deployed anywhere in the world."

In a department-wide memo released Thursday on "Retention Policy for Non-Deployable Service Members," Wilkie said he would also be seeking to establish "standardized criteria for retaining non-deployable service members."
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  This is a good policy shift.
This has been one of my pet peeves.

Having ghost units in rear detachment full of profile ponies and non-deploy-ables.
Posted by: newc   2018-02-18 21:23  

#5  Too many 'foreign adventures', yes, the downfall of empires is fiscal blood loss brought on by not knowing when to quit expanding.
On the other hand, histories of WW-1 talk about cavalry Majors unfit to ride horses (!) so they had to go to war in carriages. Also how much bureaucracy do we really need (Spoiler: less than the REMFs desire.)
Posted by: magpie   2018-02-18 18:32  

#4  No, the solution is to stop fucking deploying so often. WTF? We're not world police. We don't need to be everywhere. Bring the troops home. Close the bases. Spend the money on ourselves instead.
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309   2018-02-18 13:59  

#3  Due to exceptions, the final number discharged over next five years will probably not exceed 125. Looks good on paper though.

Posted by: Unaling Thuting1065   2018-02-18 13:54  

#2  Wilkie said there would be exceptions for pregnancies and the services would also be able to retain wounded troops who are cleared by medical boards.

Female privilege? Someone has got to take their place in the deployment. WAC era they were discharged. Then the brass said make it work. Then there was a classified Army IG report after Desert Storm on the number of females removed from theater when they turned up pregnant. Then the blow up when a theater commander said something along the lines of court martial (given that for all of military history, males who had inflicted wounds or injuries to avoid combat or danger where roughly treated). They insist on 'abortion on demand', so it's choice to make oneself non-deployable.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-02-18 12:26  

#1  ...This has been a semi-secret for some years now, in that the world at large hasn't been aware of the problem, but the poor SOBs who have to keep going back sure as hell have known about it. I suspect too that there is going to be a thorough combing of emergency deployment plans so that there is NO question that if you are a single parent, there better be someone to take care of your child.

Mike

Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2018-02-18 12:25  

00:00