You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
State Department defends reorganization, admits low morale
2017-11-19
Some facts and figures to counter the posturing.
[Yahoo] The State Department is hitting back at the growing bipartisan criticism of Rex Tillerson's leadership and accusations he is presiding over a debilitating brain drain of the nation's diplomatic corps. At the same time, it allowed that a lack of communication with employees about Tillerson's intent to reorganize the department had contributed to low morale.

In a letter to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Republican chairman, the department said Tillerson's reorganization plans aren't crippling the agency as reports have claimed. Top ranks aren't being intentionally gutted through attrition, mass retirements and buyouts, it said, and a planned 8 percent reduction of its nearly 75,000 employees had been mandated by the Office of Management and Budget and is proceeding under that order.

In the letter, which was sent to Sen. Bob Corker late Thursday, the department said there are only 108 fewer foreign service officers now than in 2016. The tally is still 2,000 more than there were in 2008, it said.

It said a widely cited figure that 60 percent of diplomats at the highest level had left the foreign service since January is a "distortion" because only six people held the rank known as "career ambassador." Two remain, it said. Since 1980, only from one to seven career ambassadors have ever served at the same time.

Nevertheless, the letter seems unlikely to stem the criticism of Tillerson. Critics also point to departures of senior and mid-level foreign service officers and a hiring freeze of entry level diplomats that has been relaxed only to take on about 100 new employees in the current budget year. That's about a third of recent yearly intakes.

Democratic and Republican politicians also oppose Tillerson's proposal to cut the department's budget by nearly 30 percent, suggesting there will be rancorous exchanges on staffing levels in coming months.

The State Department feels the criticism is unfair. In its letter to Corker, the agency said there are only 20 fewer senior foreign service officers now than there were a year ago (1,048 compared with 1,068). This year's retirements are five fewer than in 2016, it said. Buyouts to induce early retirement of more than 600 diplomats are consistent with a directive to reduce the federal workforce.

It said reorganization is a work in progress, appealing for patience as officials make the department "more efficient and effective within a sustainable budget."
Posted by:trailing wife

#13  If Hillary and Obama hadn't crookedly siphoned so much boodle for themselves, there would be more than enough to operate.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-19 23:03  

#12  Rex is presiding over a brain drain in the diplomatic corp. It seems like that is a good thing.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-19 18:55  

#11  debilitating brain drain

Translation: "All of the high-paying lobbyist jobs are already taken!"
Posted by: PBMcL   2017-11-19 17:05  

#10  It's easier to "go native" if you're already a foreign national
Posted by: Frank G   2017-11-19 14:31  

#9  The Department of State budget is $50 billion for 70000 employees (most foreign nationals). The budget is twice per employee of the DOD. What does America get for it vs alternatives? How many aircraft carriers does DoS have?
Posted by: Glereth Ebberens5592   2017-11-19 14:26  

#8  "Don't cut our staff and perks, or we'll just suck even more at our jobs while implementing our own foreign policy!"

Not a convincing argument
Posted by: Frank G   2017-11-19 10:28  

#7  Didn't phase them when with all the worldwide commitments that the Army personal authorization was cut more than 10%. Learn to live with it pin stripes.

2010 - 532,400
2017 - 476,000
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-11-19 08:44  

#6  Why stop at 8%?

A first-round target, gorb, pending the results of the review of current staffing and projects, with an eye toward changed priorities driving reorganization. Given the proposed 30% budget cut, future reductions of staff are clearly anticipated, suggested by the point about staffing still being 2,000 higher than in 2008 -- at the end of George W. Bush's presidency.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-11-19 07:27  

#5  Why stop at 8%?
Posted by: gorb   2017-11-19 04:14  

#4  Saudi payments stopped?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-11-19 03:25  

#3  everyone has faceberg or twitter, no?
Posted by: newc   2017-11-19 03:17  

#2  It's not like State has been a model of competence and efficiency for a long time; with that in mind, why should I care about their morale?
Posted by: Glenmore   2017-11-19 01:08  

#1  The State Department's miserable foreign policy resulted in the gutting of American jobs and mass layoffs for everyone but them. Now they're having a single round of layoffs and they're screaming the same excuses we tried to use (don't fire your experts, etc.) It's wonderful to see that justice is finally being done.
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309   2017-11-19 01:02  

00:00