Submit your comments on this article |
Down Under |
Kiribati sinking |
2017-10-14 |
[JoanneNova] "We are the people who will be swimming," he said. "The question will be ‐ will those people on the lifeboats bother to pull us in or push us away because we would be too problematic?" Kiribati’s highest point is 13m above water, and is sinking at a rate of 1mm a year (see the updated graph below by Eyes On Browne). To rephrase Euan Mearns, at this rate, complete inundation of it will take 13,000 years. The Titanic’s elevation (waterline to the deck) was 18m, so it was 50% higher, yet it sank in 2 hours 40 minutes. That’s one ninth of a day, or one 3,285th of a year. Conservatively, the comparative speed works out to be 42.7 million times faster. Allowing for the higher elevation (but discounting funnels and/or palms) that would be 59.1 million times faster. ![]() For some reason the ABC was unable to do an internet search on the words "Kiribati, Tide Gauges, Sea Level". With a billion dollars to spend, apparently they can only afford a one way internet cable. Just enough to upload news stories like this which are essentially a repeat of a press release, unchecked from President Tong: Kiribati...is already suffering from the effects of climate change. No matter how melodramatic the claim, there are no hard questions from journalist Sarah Hancock. Good luck to Mr Tong. He is just playing the cards he is offered. Pity the ABC though. I wouldn’t want to be them when Australian’s realize that they are paying for an internet rerouting service from socialist troughers, freeloading gravy hunters and pagan czars. |
Posted by:Anomalous Sources |
#1 You can visualize Kiribati as the top of a very large pile of rubble that slowly settles, or a bit quicker when there is an earthquake. There is no money in crap geology, but there is in rising sea levels. Which is all you really need to know. |
Posted by: phil_b 2017-10-14 06:42 |