Submit your comments on this article |
Arabia |
Saudi man files lawsuit against guy who killed ant |
2017-10-11 |
[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] Eight years ago, a Saudi man filed a lawsuit against a resident who "stepped on an ant on purpose." According to the plaintiff, his actions were "not an exemplary of Islam’s teachings." The man said that "an ant is one of one God’s living creatures and has a right [to live]." He demanded that "Islamic law rules" are enforced on defendant. Judge Mohammed al-Fayez accepted the case. Speaking to the plaintiff, Fayez said: "Your claim was accepted and as the ant’s attorney, it is clear to me that when you filed the case, you did not provide a legitimate attorney contract from the parents of the ant that was killed by the defendant. "As such, the case cannot proceed unless the concerned individual is present or has a legitimate attorney." The judge then continued to ask the plaintiff to bring a legitimate attorney contract from the ant’s parents. Once he does, the court will then "ask the defendant to come to court." The man was shocked by the judge’s reply and had no response but to leave the court. |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 An unexpectedly rational position from the judge. |
Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2017-10-11 12:29 |
#6 The fool forgot that all happens because Allah has so willed it. He seeks to forbid Allah His will through His chosen agent --- BLASPHEMER!! |
Posted by: trailing wife 2017-10-11 11:58 |
#5 The man said that "an ant is one of one God’s living creatures and has a right [to live]." He demanded that "Islamic law rules" are enforced on defendant. "Now a Jooooo? I'm cool with that" he added |
Posted by: Frank G 2017-10-11 08:36 |
#4 The gossip mill says it was an infidel ant. |
Posted by: Hupiper Mussolini3316 2017-10-11 04:16 |
#3 Seems fitting - Adam Ant's career is dead at this point. |
Posted by: Raj 2017-10-11 02:30 |
#2 A clear case of BarrANTry... *rimshot* |
Posted by: Fester Scourge of the Bunions3692 2017-10-11 01:46 |
#1 As a good Muslim, the plaintiff should pay for the ant's attorney in the absence of its relatives. The ant must be given a voice! |
Posted by: gorb 2017-10-11 00:49 |