| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Chaos Erupts At City Hall Hearing For Proposed Gun Bill |
| 2017-07-28 |
| [BALTIMORE.CBSLOCAL] Chaos erupted Tuesday at a Baltimore City Hall hearing for a proposed mandatory one-year sentence for possession of an illegal handgun. It took just minutes for rising tensions to overflow. Council members had issued several warnings to unruly attendees, but police were called to move in as activists clashed with council members, and people pushed back. It ended with two arrests and a lot of upset people. The Baltimore Police Department says a 29-year-old and a 27-year-old were locked away Don't shoot, coppers! I'm comin' out! and will face charges. At least one person was injured as police pulled people from the room, and an ambulance was called to the scene. Police say the 27-year-old who was arrested complained of chest pains after being arrested. He has been transported to a local hospital for treatment. After all of Tuesday’s events, council members voted through an amended gun bill by a 5-2 vote, moving it to the next round. City officials say they’re trying to end the slow motion massacre on the streets of Baltimore by putting a gun law back on the books that says those found guilty of carrying an illegal gun will be given a mandatory year-long sentence. "To say this is going to make a difference, I hope so," says councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke. "I hope it will, because we have the votes here." Council member Brandon Scott, of the 2nd district, says he’s against the bill in any form. "The amendments make the bill easier to stomach, it still doesn’t change the fact that I disagree with the bill in its entirety and its principles of mandatory minimums," he says. One of the staunchest supporters of the bill says he’s not a fan of the amendments, but he was willing to compromise in order to get closer to the goal. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #1 Why not 'recommended minimums' instead of mandatory ones, so the courts don't HAVE to sentence innocent people like they do in NJ, for stuff like taking your firearm-containing luggage from baggage claim if your flight is diverted to Newark, or driving across the bridge from PA, even by mistake? (I know the answer - judges are afraid of being accused of racism if they exercise judgement so they don't want to have to.) |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2017-07-28 09:51 |